- 1. Several unrelated items (all LBC!) (but long) (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 10:39:05 -0700
- Howdy fellow listers. Several items for you today . . . At long last my '71 Midget is finished - or has at least moved into the drive-it-while-maintaining-and-improving stage. It's been off the road
- /html/spridgets/2003-08/msg00257.html (10,742 bytes)
- 2. Re: Several unrelated items (all LBC!) (but long) (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 11:09:08 -0700 (PDT)
- -- "philip.s.jones" <philip.s.jones@comcast.net> I'd think the cam would be more of a driver in setting the clearances than the rockers themselves. __________________________________ Yahoo! SiteBuild
- /html/spridgets/2003-08/msg00258.html (7,776 bytes)
- 3. Re: Several unrelated items (all LBC!) (but long) (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 16:23:51 EDT
- The cam does dictate clearance to some extent. If you have carbon fibre pushrods that also has a factor. If the rockers are high lift than that also makes a difference. I spoke to my dyno car about r
- /html/spridgets/2003-08/msg00259.html (8,209 bytes)
- 4. Re: Several unrelated items (all LBC!) (but long) (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 14:19:33 -0700 (PDT)
- Very true - I made the (probably incorrect) assumption that he was going with the same rocker ratio. __________________________________ Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
- /html/spridgets/2003-08/msg00263.html (8,263 bytes)
- 5. Re: Several unrelated items (all LBC!) (but long) (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 16:41:51 -0500
- Yeah, Ron, he did say "Titan 1.625 roller rockers" in there somewhere. I take it that the issue is that the actual amount of clearance between the cam lobe and the cam follower needs to remain the s
- /html/spridgets/2003-08/msg00264.html (7,728 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu