Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Shock\s+adjustment\s+access\s+rule\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Shock\s+adjustment\s+access\s+rule\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Shock adjustment access rule (score: 1): Author: "Burns, James B." <James.Burns@jhuapl.edu>; Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 09:02:52 -0400; A while back there was a proposed rule change to allow cutting interior trim panels to give access to shock adjustments in stock class. Did this get approved? Brad Burns '97 M3, A-stock /// autox@aut; /html/autox/2001-09/msg00251.html (7,621 bytes)
2. Re: Shock adjustment access rule (score: 1): Author: "Bruce Wentzel" <greendotracing@netzero.net>; Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 11:43:46 -0400; It's in the latest FasTrack to be effective 1/1/02 I didn't recall that the initial proposal was limited to interior panels. Is it too late to get a revision? The C4 Corvettes have a plastic panel th; /html/autox/2001-09/msg00255.html (8,733 bytes)
3. RE: Shock adjustment access rule (score: 1): Author: "Burns, James B." <James.Burns@jhuapl.edu>; Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 13:15:04 -0400; The wording "a hole may be drilled in an interior body panel" does seem restrictive. Is a panel in the trunk an interior body panel? How about in the engine compartment? What about carpet and sound d; /html/autox/2001-09/msg00260.html (10,141 bytes)
4. RE: Shock adjustment access rule (score: 1): Author: "Larry Steckel" <lorenzoscribe@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 13:27:06 -0400; The allowance has just been passed and already the can of worms has already been opened. Larry _________________________________________________________________ /// autox@autox.team.net mailing list; /html/autox/2001-09/msg00261.html (11,644 bytes)
5. Re: Shock adjustment access rule (score: 1): Author: TeamZ06@aol.com; Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 13:36:23 EDT; Larry, Don't you wish, but I'm afraid it won't serve your "anti-aftermarket shock" position as well as you'd like. The truth is the ruling allows a competitor to provide access to shock absorber adju; /html/autox/2001-09/msg00263.html (8,081 bytes)
6. Re: Shock adjustment access rule (score: 1): Author: "Bruce Wentzel" <greendotracing@netzero.net>; Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 14:24:19 -0400; jeez Mark, I didn't read any ulterior motives into Larry's comment. I might have not been paying enough attention when this first was proposed, but it has limited value in the approved wording as it; /html/autox/2001-09/msg00269.html (9,771 bytes)
7. Re: Shock adjustment access rule (score: 1): Author: Kevin Stevens <Kevin_Stevens@pursued-with.net>; Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 18:15:08 -0700 (PDT); I'd call the engine compartment the interior of the car - sounds more appropriate than calling it the exterior, doesn't it? KeS (who doesn't agree with the rule in the first place, but that's a moot; /html/autox/2001-09/msg00285.html (10,924 bytes)
8. Re: Shock adjustment access rule (score: 1): Author: "Bruce Wentzel" <greendotracing@netzero.net>; Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 22:47:53 -0400; You're absolutely right. I've got to learn to think outside the box. proposed, adjustable it several recently. majordomo@autox.team.net majordomo@autox.team.net Only $9.95 per month! Sign up in Septe; /html/autox/2001-09/msg00298.html (11,892 bytes)
9. Re: Shock adjustment access rule (score: 1): Author: Vince Bly <vbly@pop200.gsfc.nasa.gov>; Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 16:18:23 -0400; == Brad, Yes, it was approved. I've been working on this for some time. There was a note in FastTrack-about the July or August issue. I believe the note said it would go into effect "Jan. 1, 2001"--i; /html/autox/2001-09/msg00321.html (8,536 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]