Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Shock\s+replacement\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Shock\s+replacement\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. Shock replacement (score: 1): Author: "Douglas B. Gaither" <dbgaither@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2000 08:44:17 -0800; I've torn my front end apart ('66B) and the shocks seems to give good resistance. So as I was cleaning them up and changing the fluid, I noticed metal particles coming from one the the shocks. I beli; /html/mgs/2000-08/msg00094.html (7,373 bytes)
2. Re: Shock replacement (score: 1): Author: Larry Colen <lrcar@red4est.com>; Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2000 10:14:00 -0700; The same reason that you replace the brakes on both sides at the same time. You want your handling to be symmetrical lest the car develope an surprising tendancy to change direction in an unpredictab; /html/mgs/2000-08/msg00097.html (7,151 bytes)
3. Re: Shock replacement (score: 1): Author: Ajhsys@aol.com; Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2000 16:41:25 EDT; << My questions are: Is there any reason to replace both shocks at the same time? (even though the other is seemingly 'good') I've heard many comments about faulty rebuilt units. I've also read that; /html/mgs/2000-08/msg00120.html (7,786 bytes)
4. Re: Shock replacement (score: 1): Author: James Nazarian Jr <James.Nazarian@Colorado.EDU>; Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2000 14:56:27 -0600 (MDT); You are a funny guy Allen. LOL James Nazarian (Apparently, lacking in his implementation of the english language); /html/mgs/2000-08/msg00125.html (6,865 bytes)
5. Re: Shock replacement (score: 1): Author: JustBrits@aol.com; Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2000 20:22:10 EDT; << He will not steer you wrong or bounce you around. >> OH MY G*D, THAT IS "LAME", Allen!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Ed PS: LOL; /html/mgs/2000-08/msg00148.html (6,814 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]