Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Shock\s+theory\.\.\.$\s+Dang\s+Goodman\s+$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Shock\s+theory\.\.\.$\s+Dang\s+Goodman\s+$\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Shock theory...( Dang Goodman ) (score: 1): Author: "Keith Turk" <kturk@ala.net>; Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 08:43:09 -0500; Okay so John and I are talking yesterday and he asks some silly question If your shocks are set up like a passenger car... aren't they going to be designed around several inches of movement Vs the li; /html/land-speed/2004-07/msg00162.html (7,423 bytes)
2. Re: Shock theory...( Dang Goodman ) (score: 1): Author: "Ron Gibson" <rgg14@cox.net>; Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 12:39:32 -0500; Just a thought. Wouldn't an unequal length bell crank also change the valving requirements for the shock? 2 to 1 ratio would double the stiffness of the shock. I could see where there would be no dam; /html/land-speed/2004-07/msg00163.html (7,660 bytes)
3. RE: Shock theory...( Dang Goodman ) (score: 1): Author: "Albaugh, Neil" <albaugh_neil@ti.com>; Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 11:27:00 -0500; True, your shocks have very limited travel but racing shocks-- as opposed to street shocks-- do have the ability to damp small inputs. Competition shocks from Koni, Bilstein, etc are expensive but t; /html/land-speed/2004-07/msg00191.html (8,153 bytes)
4. RE: Shock theory...( Dang Goodman ) (score: 1): Author: John Goodman <ggl205@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 11:34:27 -0700 (PDT); Even the best racing shocks, and I would include Ohlins and Penske in the lot, are good to about .200" of travel. Anything less than that and you loose the benefit of those very expensive dampers. Y; /html/land-speed/2004-07/msg00197.html (8,056 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]