Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Shroud\s+This\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Shroud\s+This\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Shroud This (score: 1): Author: SJC Worldwide <ssage@socal.rr.com>; Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 18:45:07 -0700; Here's a cooling question for the list. Has anyone come up with a modified fan shroud so that the back 1/2 or 1/3 of the fan is not enclosed by the shroud? I checked the list archives and there has b; /html/tigers/2001-07/msg00240.html (7,196 bytes)
2. Re: Shroud This (score: 1): Author: Steve Laifman <SLaifman@SoCal.RR.com>; Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 21:13:39 -0700; Steve, That fan, installed on a properly set-back and reversed water pump to unique Tiger specifications, works just fine, and pumps just fine. No need for adjustment. Provided you do have the correc; /html/tigers/2001-07/msg00243.html (8,231 bytes)
3. Re: Shroud This (score: 1): Author: sosnaenergyconsulting@home.com; Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 21:49:44 -0700; I seem to remember that the study pointed to the pusher fan as the best single cool-down item (bang for the buck)--yes, no? Perhaps that might be better than modifying the shroud? Regards David Sosn; /html/tigers/2001-07/msg00246.html (7,694 bytes)
4. RE: Shroud This (score: 1): Author: "Bob Palmer" <rpalmer@ucsd.edu>; Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 22:04:52 -0700; Those of you who are interested in the TEAE Tiger & Alpine cooling study, the most comprehensive and objective study to date on this issue, can read the report on the TEAE Website: http://www.teae.o; /html/tigers/2001-07/msg00247.html (8,206 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]