Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Slick\s+50\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Slick\s+50\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. RE: Slick 50 (score: 1): Author: "Maynard Hirsch" <mghirsch@netzero.net>; Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 09:24:12 -0600; My experience has been that quality synthetic oil does everything that additives (i.e. Slick 50) claim to do. Maynard Hirsch /// /// mgs@autox.team.net mailing list /// or try http://www.team.net/cgi; /html/mgs/2002-03/msg00742.html (6,715 bytes)
2. Re: Slick 50 (score: 1): Author: Dan DiBiase <d_dibiase@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 14:19:55 -0800 (PST); I don't know about these additives, I have never used any, reasoning that 1) I don't drive my cars in extremes of heat or cold and 2) I religiously have changed my oil in all of my cars every 3,000 m; /html/mgs/2002-03/msg00769.html (7,293 bytes)
3. Re: Slick 50 (score: 1): Author: David Littlefield <dmeadow@juno.com>; Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 16:20:25 -0600; I think this had been discussed before some time ago, so perhaps more can be found in the archives. There were some objective scientific studies done (it is out on the net somewhere). The result was; /html/mgs/2002-03/msg00772.html (7,133 bytes)
4. Re: Slick 50 (score: 1): Author: MGTD1952@cs.com; Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 18:37:55 EST; I purchased the Slick 50 Engine Treatment (oil additive) and Transmission treatment for my Spring oil change in 2000. Before I had a chance to actually do the cahgne, I went a bout a brand new Mustan; /html/mgs/2002-03/msg00778.html (7,163 bytes)
5. Slick 50 (score: 1): Author: Lambertus Palte <palte@gmx.net>; Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 15:03:36 +0100 (MET); OH NO! Not Again! -- GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet. http://www.gmx.net /// /// mgs@autox.team.net mailing list /// or try http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool ///; /html/mgs/2002-03/msg00797.html (6,622 bytes)
6. Slick 50 (score: 1): Author: BDurgin1@aol.com; Date: Sun, 2 Jun 1996 00:52:07 -0400; Thanks for all the replies on the idle question and the charging system. Got a buddy who just bought a 67 'B and wants to put Slick 50 in when he changes the oil. He said he has put this into every c; /html/mgs/1996-06/msg00015.html (7,174 bytes)
7. Slick 50 (score: 1): Author: BDurgin1@aol.com; Date: Sun, 2 Jun 1996 10:17:45 -0400; Thanks to everyone who replied to my message about lower idling and generators on my '64B. I've got a buddy who just purchased a '67 B. The engine has been rebuilt but no documentation was available; /html/mgs/1996-06/msg00021.html (7,297 bytes)
8. Slick 50 (score: 1): Author: BDurgin1@aol.com; Date: Sun, 2 Jun 1996 20:37:26 -0400; Thanks to all who responded on the idling question and the generator. I have a buddy who just bought a '67 B in good shape. He intends to put in Slick 50 on his first oil change. To his knowledge thi; /html/mgs/1996-06/msg00034.html (7,275 bytes)
9. Slick 50 (score: 1): Author: midget@megumi.system.nitech.ac.jp (Kazuya Horibe); Date: Mon, 3 Jun 96 11:31:34 JST; I put in Slick 50 on my midget 1500 engine(he has stage 3 tuning engine) ,gearbox and differential. It work good,especially gearbox. I think Slick 50 will act on smooth engine rotating and prevent fr; /html/mgs/1996-06/msg00036.html (7,877 bytes)
10. Re: Slick 50 (score: 1): Author: RJohn50603@aol.com; Date: Mon, 3 Jun 1996 14:57:21 -0400; To all, I've always liked Fram filters and saw something a Western Auto I hadn't seen before (just after changing my oil and filter). Fram now has a premimum filter with a teflon engine treatment in; /html/mgs/1996-06/msg00046.html (7,245 bytes)
11. RE: Slick 50 (score: 1): Author: "J. Knight" <taoistjd@ix.netcom.com>; Date: Mon, 3 Jun 96 08:38:07 -0400; NEA! for several reasons... I spent several years working for a multi-state parts chain and this was a big discussion. We reviewed independent testing, done by various firms, on Slick 50 and the othe; /html/mgs/1996-06/msg00062.html (9,449 bytes)
12. Re:slick 50 (score: 1): Author: "J. Knight" <taoistjd@ix.netcom.com>; Date: Tue, 4 Jun 96 00:37:00 -0400; NEA! for several reasons... I spent several years working for a multi-state parts chain and this was a big discussion. We reviewed independent testing, done by various firms, on Slick 50 and the othe; /html/mgs/1996-06/msg00063.html (9,309 bytes)
13. Re: Slick 50 (score: 1): Author: wise@db.erau.edu (John A. Wise); Date: Tue, 4 Jun 1996 07:41:35 -0800; I just got back from a long weekend, so I am a little behind. If anyone is interested in a review of Slick 50 (from ROAD RIDER/August 1992/Pg 15) send me a note and I will zap you a copy. It is a big; /html/mgs/1996-06/msg00072.html (7,338 bytes)
14. RE: slick 50 (score: 1): Author: Wes Grady <wesgrady@csbh.mhv.net>; Date: Tue, 4 Jun 1996 07:47:01 -0400; What I find most interesting is that Dupont has stated from the outset = that they do not approve of this use of Teflon and that they will not = honor any claim relative to engine damage as a result; /html/mgs/1996-06/msg00074.html (7,097 bytes)
15. RE: Slick 50 (score: 1): Author: macleodm@cadvision.com (Michael MacLeod); Date: Tue, 4 Jun 1996 07:11:45 -0600; Thanks for the information. I was looking for some concrete reasons why this stuff shouldn't work. Intuitively it seems wrong, if only because it is being touted on infomercials. (The infomercials a; /html/mgs/1996-06/msg00079.html (8,322 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]