Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Smog\s+Tests\s+\-\s+California\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Smog\s+Tests\s+\-\s+California\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. RE: Smog Tests - California (score: 1): Author: brooked@bre.co.uk; Date: Fri, 17 Nov 1995 09:48:14 EST; Firstly, a belated Thankyou to all who replied to the request for information regarding smog testing in California. Unfortunately none of you really answered the question - I have to assume you under; /html/mgs/1995-11/msg00371.html (8,152 bytes)
2. RE: Smog Tests - California (score: 1): Author: fickes@taurus.apple.com (Stan Fickes); Date: Fri, 17 Nov 1995 13:45:12 -0800; It would probably fail if it were tested, but a friend of mine in the California Highway Patrol has assured me that any car built before 1965 no longer requires any testing -- either on a regular ba; /html/mgs/1995-11/msg00386.html (8,426 bytes)
3. RE: Smog Tests - California (score: 1): Author: john bartholomew <jdb70@juts.ccc.amdahl.com>; Date: Mon, 20 Nov 95 07:42:52 PST; Stam, With reference to your comments on the following.... on the station polite leeway in --snip-- It is my understanding that if a *hybrid* is presented to be smogged, the most current age item is; /html/mgs/1995-11/msg00422.html (8,286 bytes)
4. RE: Smog Tests - California (score: 1): Author: fickes@taurus.apple.com (Stan Fickes); Date: Mon, 20 Nov 1995 10:17:03 -0800; Which is what I had thought too. My friend at CHP was adamant that it only applies to '66 and later cars, NOT anything built before '66. Just as an aside, he is in the inspection division of CHP, no; /html/mgs/1995-11/msg00435.html (8,562 bytes)
5. RE: Smog Tests - California (score: 1): Author: lawref@lawref.com (Ernest E. Gilbert); Date: Mon, 20 Nov 1995 16:00:03 -0800; This is confirmed by my local and knowlegable BAR certified smog man. It is also my long standing understanding Ernest E. Gilbert lawref@lawref.com http://www.lawref.com/lawref/ http://www.lawref.co; /html/mgs/1995-11/msg00438.html (7,687 bytes)
6. RE: Smog Tests - California (score: 1): Author: n6mod@rahul.net (Aleksandr Milewski); Date: Mon, 20 Nov 1995 20:15:07 -0800; I did a little research into this when my father was considering dropping a Porsche-6 into his Vanagon. :-) I don't think that this is legal. My understanding was that the donor engine must be the sa; /html/mgs/1995-11/msg00451.html (8,139 bytes)
7. RE: Smog Tests - California (score: 1): Author: lawref@lawref.com (Ernest E. Gilbert); Date: Tue, 21 Nov 1995 06:43:18 -0800; It may make sense to you but if the car is titled as a '50 MG the DMV won't ask for a smog cert either to transfer or register so why did the smog man look under the hood to find the '80 engine in t; /html/mgs/1995-11/msg00464.html (8,363 bytes)
8. RE: Smog Tests - California (score: 1): Author: john bartholomew <jdb70@juts.ccc.amdahl.com>; Date: Tue, 21 Nov 95 08:23:04 PST; Of course you are correct. I was really using 1950 as a generic number to illustrate my point, without thinking of *precisely* what I was saying. The 1964 year, I believe, was the last year that did; /html/mgs/1995-11/msg00474.html (7,993 bytes)
9. RE: Smog Tests - California (score: 1): Author: lawref@lawref.com (Ernest E. Gilbert); Date: Tue, 21 Nov 1995 13:12:39 -0800; Thanks, I needed that, but all this mail on Cal smog got me into the reaearch mode. Much to my surprise the laws are not in the vehicle code, but rather in the Health & Safety Code beginning at sect; /html/mgs/1995-11/msg00526.html (9,376 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]