Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Smogging\s+the\s+B\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Smogging\s+the\s+B\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. Smogging the B (score: 1): Author: Bill Harkins <bharkins@tfb.com>; Date: Tue, 25 Mar 1997 17:16:50 -0800; I have justg gone through the excercise of getting a new piece of paper from the smog police to hand to the new buyer of my 67 B/GT. An excercise in total idiocy, if there ever was one. Took the car; /html/mgs/1997-03/msg01310.html (9,391 bytes)
2. Re: Smogging the B (score: 1): Author: damitdick@juno.com (W. J. Richard Criswell); Date: Tue, 25 Mar 1997 21:29:31 EST; Bill etal... My '80 MGB-LE has not turned a wheel in nearly two years simply because I cannot get it passed the "It's not visually Stock" attitude. I wanted to use the "CA Legal" weber set up with an; /html/mgs/1997-03/msg01313.html (10,868 bytes)
3. Re: Smogging the B (score: 1): Author: Nolan Penney <npenney@erols.com>; Date: Thu, 27 Mar 1997 09:17:54 -0800; No, it's not crazy. The car that was yesterdays gross polluter has been turned into a legal car. No crazyness about it. Just as yesterdays illegal car with the missing windshield can be transformed; /html/mgs/1997-03/msg01386.html (8,599 bytes)
4. Re: Smogging the B (score: 1): Author: Nolan Penney <npenney@erols.com>; Date: Thu, 27 Mar 1997 09:25:56 -0800; Well DUHH!!! Your car is an 80, that's six years after 74 standards. Cripes, by that logic I shouldn't have to have headlights on the TF since they weren't required back in the 20's. Come on, crying; /html/mgs/1997-03/msg01387.html (8,862 bytes)
5. Re: Smogging the B (score: 1): Author: pbailey <pbailey@qnet.com>; Date: Thu, 27 Mar 1997 07:29:39 -0800; I just have to respond to this one!!He is saying it won't pass VISUALLY not that it wouldn't pass at all!!This is what we are griping about it doesn't matter WHAT comes out the pipe.So you would go; /html/mgs/1997-03/msg01391.html (9,405 bytes)
6. Re: Smogging the B (score: 1): Author: Nolan Penney <npenney@erols.com>; Date: Thu, 27 Mar 1997 18:16:17 -0500; You have a different take on his message/complaint then I. I am willing to fight, and have fought, various dragons. I'm also a bit of a pragmatist. I'm not going to put my car on blocks because it's; /html/mgs/1997-03/msg01419.html (9,937 bytes)
7. Re: Smogging the B (score: 1): Author: pbailey <pbailey@qnet.com>; Date: Thu, 27 Mar 1997 18:32:06 -0800; Why should we HAVE to "play the game"?You don't seem to mind having to do all this crap to get to drive your car,I do!! Why do you think Quinton Kopp is sponsoring this 25 year bill? Just out of the; /html/mgs/1997-03/msg01428.html (8,662 bytes)
8. Re: Smogging the B (score: 1): Author: Nolan Penney <npenney@erols.com>; Date: Fri, 28 Mar 1997 10:28:25 -0800; I mind. That's why I fight it. But I don't fight it by putting my car up on blocks and sulking about it. Great! Putting a car up on blocks and sulking about it won't change elections though. Fightin; /html/mgs/1997-03/msg01445.html (8,795 bytes)
9. Re: Smogging the B (score: 1): Author: Nolan Penney <npenney@erols.com>; Date: Fri, 28 Mar 1997 10:44:07 -0800; Absolutely. And those day dreaming bureaucrats have already given saction to those special cars. Called historics and streetrods and such, and you're exempt. Only if you are determined to make your; /html/mgs/1997-03/msg01446.html (11,989 bytes)
10. Re: Smogging the B (score: 1): Author: Ross MacPherson <arm@unix.infoserve.net>; Date: Fri, 28 Mar 1997 10:33:16 -0800; here in the US. pollution is lower air is gonna try to pretend I haven't been following this thread too much but as a Canadian I've got to jump in here. I live in the Lower Mainland of BC and we no l; /html/mgs/1997-03/msg01450.html (11,294 bytes)
11. Re: Smogging the B (score: 1): Author: Steve Darby <elan@highfiber.com>; Date: Fri, 28 Mar 1997 22:51:40 -0800; What is right? Wheather the cars (in CA there are millions) are the major polluters or the stationary sourses dosn,t really matter. What counts is TRYING to help get rid of the smog in the San Fernan; /html/mgs/1997-03/msg01473.html (9,609 bytes)
12. Re: Smogging the B (score: 1): Author: Ulix Goettsch <ulix@u.washington.edu>; Date: Sat, 29 Mar 1997 09:32:01 -0800 (PST); Not true. New cars require cats with O2 sensors (why 2 ?). If you install a aftermarket cat kit on your classic car, you get a tax break and you are allowed to drive on "smog-alert days" in big citie; /html/mgs/1997-03/msg01484.html (9,491 bytes)
13. Re: Smogging the B (score: 1): Author: Nolan Penney <npenney@erols.com>; Date: Sat, 29 Mar 1997 21:11:15 -0500; Well I didn't get the take on your original post that I do on this one. It did seem to me that you were griping that you couldn't swap in 1974 stuff on a 1980 car. Not a case of making a "reasonable; /html/mgs/1997-03/msg01497.html (13,634 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]