Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Solid\s+Rubber\s+tires\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Solid\s+Rubber\s+tires\?\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Solid Rubber tires? (score: 1): Author: Dick J <lsr_man@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2002 08:56:16 -0700 (PDT); Reading through the metal wheel thread brings a question to mind. For years, every spring when I pull the wheelbarrow out of the shed and find a flat tire, I've threatened to pull the valve stem, get; /html/land-speed/2002-08/msg00367.html (7,688 bytes)
2. Re: Solid Rubber tires? (score: 1): Author: "Glen Barrett" <speedtimer@charter.net>; Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2002 09:39:06 -0700; The problem I see with solid rubber tires is the rotating mass and chuncking off pieces of the rubber. We spend a lot of time picking up rubber from the course off of standard racing tires each meet; /html/land-speed/2002-08/msg00370.html (7,716 bytes)
3. Re: Solid Rubber tires? (score: 1): Author: W S Potter <wester6935@attbi.com>; Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2002 11:17:06 -0700; Rotating weight! Wes /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo /// Archives at http://www.team.net/archive/land-speed /// wha; /html/land-speed/2002-08/msg00371.html (7,934 bytes)
4. Re: Solid Rubber tires? (score: 1): Author: John Szalay <john.szalay@postoffice.worldnet.att.net>; Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2002 13:25:04 -0400; My thoughts as well, lots of rotating mass. John Szalay /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo /// Archives at http://www.; /html/land-speed/2002-08/msg00372.html (7,823 bytes)
5. Re: Solid Rubber tires? (score: 1): Author: Dick J <lsr_man@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2002 18:59:20 -0700 (PDT); Is rotating weight always bad? Why some heavy steel flywheels and some light aluminum flywheels. Wouldn't heavy rotating tires carry momentum? Wouldn't they be smoother over small surface imperfectio; /html/land-speed/2002-08/msg00389.html (8,168 bytes)
6. RE: Solid Rubber tires? (score: 1): Author: "Russel Mack" <rtmack@concentric.net>; Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2002 23:10:11 -0500; you make some good points, Dick J. However, I think where Wes is coming from is that (at our intended high speeds) centrifugal force tries to expand the tire carcass to failure (even on our inflated; /html/land-speed/2002-08/msg00392.html (9,302 bytes)
7. Re: Solid Rubber tires? (score: 1): Author: Nt788@aol.com; Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2002 11:46:43 EDT; << That makes me wonder, wouldn't solid rubber tires work better on LSR cars than traditional pneumatic? Centrifugal force would destroy any solid structure even steel. A laminate made strong enough; /html/land-speed/2002-08/msg00398.html (7,933 bytes)
8. Re: Solid Rubber tires? (score: 1): Author: Nt788@aol.com; Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2002 12:25:05 EDT; Centrical force would destroy any solid material even steel. A laminate structure made strong enough would be as hard as metal. A pneumatic tire is the most friendly in regard to marking, but not mad; /html/land-speed/2002-08/msg00400.html (7,597 bytes)
9. Re: Solid Rubber tires? (score: 1): Author: "Glen Barrett" <speedtimer@charter.net>; Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 09:10:25 -0700; I forgot to remove the trailer when I first sent this. Glen -- Original Message -- From: "Glen Barrett" <speedtimer@charter.net> To: "Dick J" <lsr_man@yahoo.com>; "landspeedracer" <landspeedracer@ms; /html/land-speed/2002-08/msg00421.html (8,275 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]