Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Solve\s+the\s+Problem\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Solve\s+the\s+Problem\s*$/: 30 ]

Total 30 documents matching your query.

21. Re: Solve the Problem (score: 1): Author: Larry Paulick <larry.p@erols.com>; Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2002 08:51:22 -0400; Bob, I don't know why it went advance, other that movement when I removed the right side wires out of the way. This is probably the cause of distr. movement. The car runs great, like before after ret; /html/tigers/2002-09/msg00183.html (10,318 bytes)
22. Re: Solve the Problem (score: 1): Author: Larry Paulick <larry.p@erols.com>; Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2002 09:36:11 -0400; For those of you who have a Tiger Workshop Manual, look at Section B, Engine, Diagnoses and Testing. Then under: Poor Acceleration, Ignition system -incorrect ignition timing. Then under: Engine Does; /html/tigers/2002-09/msg00184.html (9,296 bytes)
23. RE: Solve the Problem (score: 1): Author: rhoefle@ctlinc.com; Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 11:10:40 -0400; I have watched the discussion you started with great interest and agree wholeheartedly that it was a worthwhile excercise. I think we all benefitted from it. Thanks for starting it. I should hope so; /html/tigers/2002-09/msg00186.html (8,196 bytes)
24. Re: Solve the Problem (score: 1): Author: DJoh797014@aol.com; Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 12:26:46 EDT; If you are saying that your distributor bolt loosened again after tightening it, I would look for the source of why that is occuring. Perhaps this question needs to be researched. My vote is that the; /html/tigers/2002-09/msg00188.html (8,084 bytes)
25. Re: Solve the Problem (score: 1): Author: Steve Laifman <SLaifman@SoCal.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2002 09:59:33 -0700; I agree that there are no forces at work to loosen that bolt. The reaction torque to the rotation could only get high if the bearings were seizing, then it is more likely the cam drive gears would g; /html/tigers/2002-09/msg00189.html (8,671 bytes)
26. Re: Solve the Problem (score: 1): Author: Larry Paulick <larry.p@erols.com>; Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2002 16:54:40 -0400; Hi Rick, and thanks. The discussion was meant to be a learning experience. Larry; /html/tigers/2002-09/msg00193.html (8,620 bytes)
27. Re: Solve the Problem (score: 1): Author: Larry Paulick <larry.p@erols.com>; Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2002 17:20:19 -0400; Dave, I have an obsession about antiseize, and may have used it on this as well. I will check and see after several more drives. O-ring was new with distr. into 1990 Mustang 5.0L engine. BTW obsessio; /html/tigers/2002-09/msg00195.html (8,462 bytes)
28. FW: Solve the Problem (score: 1): Author: "Bob Palmer" <rpalmer@ucsd.edu>; Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 23:05:20 -0700; My observation too. Bob Palmer rpalmer@ucsd.edu rpalmer@brobeck.com Ugh...I smeell something wrong here. The dist shaft rotates counter clockwise doesn't it? SO wouldn't a loose housing that is rota; /html/tigers/2002-09/msg00210.html (9,505 bytes)
29. Re: Solve the Problem (score: 1): Author: "Doug & Rett Leithauser" <dleit@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 08:36:10 -0400; OK, I would have thought that a loose distributor was a mechanical problem too, but I won't whine about that. The problem I had, & so many others on the list had, is failing to look beyond the last r; /html/tigers/2002-09/msg00215.html (7,894 bytes)
30. Re: Solve the Problem (score: 1): Author: BlueGolfer@aol.com; Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 09:15:02 EDT; << I would have thought that a loose distributor was a mechanical problem too, but I won't whine about that. >> I won't complain about mechanical versus electrical part of the problem. The fun thing; /html/tigers/2002-09/msg00216.html (8,500 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 30
Page: [1] [2]