Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Speed\s+vs\s+hp\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Speed\s+vs\s+hp\.\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Speed vs hp. (score: 1): Author: "Simon Rasmussen" <Simon@telephonestogo.ca>; Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 12:07:47 -0400; Jack, I believe that both aero drag and rolling resistance change as the square of speed, so for a given percentage increase in speed you need the square of that percentage increase in power. So, if; /html/fot/2004-08/msg00084.html (6,949 bytes)
2. RE: Speed vs hp. (score: 1): Author: "Randall Young" <Ryoung@navcomtech.com>; Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 09:54:45 -0700; Aero drag increases as a square (roughly), generally rolling resistance does not but it's small enough to ignore, especially for small changes near top speed. Not quite, power is force (drag) times; /html/fot/2004-08/msg00089.html (6,879 bytes)
3. Re: Speed vs hp. (score: 1): Author: Larry Young <cartravel@pobox.com>; Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 13:47:09 -0500; Rolling resistence is a constant force, so the power required to overcome it will increase linearly with speed. Drag will dominate at high speed. Drive train friction is the other big friction loss.; /html/fot/2004-08/msg00091.html (7,374 bytes)
4. RE: Speed vs hp. (score: 1): Author: "Jack W. Drews" <vinttr4@geneseo.net>; Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 15:11:58 -0500; Thanks to all who replied. I guess with my engine finished I have too much time on my brain. I was idly curious as to the cost / benefit ratio of effort and money to raise my TR's hp more than it is.; /html/fot/2004-08/msg00094.html (7,684 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]