Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Speedo\s+vs\.\s+Tach\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Speedo\s+vs\.\s+Tach\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Speedo vs. Tach (score: 1): Author: "Bob Norway" <examiner@cfl.rr.com>; Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2001 09:27:21 -0500; When push comes to shove, you can always spring for a handheld GPS unit. That will give you your most accurate forward speed based on triangulation with at least three satellites. Just a thought... (; /html/spitfires/2001-12/msg00291.html (8,057 bytes)
2. Re: Speedo vs. Tach (score: 1): Author: Michael Hargreave Mawson <OC@46thFoot.com>; Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2001 17:19:28 +0000; Ah, but surely these are only accurate to +/- 10 metres at best? This is simply not accurate enough! ATB -- Mike Michael Hargreave Mawson, author of "Eyewitness in the Crimea" http://www.greenhillboo; /html/spitfires/2001-12/msg00295.html (7,344 bytes)
3. Re: Speedo vs. Tach (score: 1): Author: "Laura Gharazeddine" <Laura.G@141.com>; Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2001 13:43:22 -0700; GPS unit. That triangulation with at But, wherer to mount it? too...LOL) Your Santa must be on a much larger budget than my Santa! Laura G. /// spitfires@autox.team.net mailing list /// or try http:; /html/spitfires/2001-12/msg00297.html (7,018 bytes)
4. Re: Speedo vs. Tach (score: 1): Author: PorscheRcr@aol.com; Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 21:24:30 EST; << >When push comes to shove, you can always spring for a handheld GPS unit. That will give you your most accurate forward speed based on triangulation with at least three satellites. Just a thought.; /html/spitfires/2001-12/msg00323.html (7,100 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]