Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Spit\s+Carb\s+part\s+missing\s+\-\s+WANTED\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Spit\s+Carb\s+part\s+missing\s+\-\s+WANTED\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. Spit Carb part missing - WANTED (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 09:44:36 -0500; Hello all, I'm currently rebuilding my spare carb (Stromberg 150-CDSE) for my '69 Spit. Since this is my first carb rebuild, I didn't want to mess the one that is on the car working (not perfectly mi; /html/triumphs/2001-01/msg01356.html (8,195 bytes)
2. Re: Spit Carb part missing - WANTED (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 10:35:50 -0500; Switch was done by PO. I do have the original HS2 with intake manifold but they too need rebuilding (actually, MAJOR rebuilding). For now, I just want to keep things simple (I'm new at all this mecha; /html/triumphs/2001-01/msg01359.html (9,180 bytes)
3. Re: Spit Carb part missing - WANTED (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 08:58:43 -0700; In my humble opinion, 2 HS2's are still less trouble than 1 ZS. My recommendation is to rebuild the SU's and you'll thank yourself later. Joe /// /// triumphs@autox.team.net mailing list ///; /html/triumphs/2001-01/msg01361.html (9,742 bytes)
4. Re: Spit Carb part missing - WANTED (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 16:17:58 -0700; The point is that the ZS is harder to tune and IMHO not as reliable as a good ole SU. Joe /// /// triumphs@autox.team.net mailing list ///; /html/triumphs/2001-01/msg01385.html (9,165 bytes)
5. Re: Spit Carb part missing - WANTED (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 17:19:59 -0700; Sure, if it is already tuned. But if it is completely disassembled and put back together, I find that the SU's are easier. But then, I have a lot more experience with SU's than those Strombergs. Joe; /html/triumphs/2001-01/msg01390.html (9,332 bytes)
6. Re: Spit Carb part missing - WANTED (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2001 14:24:17 FILETIME=[8051F060:01C086DA]; Ah, joe that ain't so at all... You aren't using the proper technique. My early TR4 came with SZ carbs... The wrong carbs for the car. I talked with an expert. He instructed me on the "proper techni; /html/triumphs/2001-01/msg01417.html (9,208 bytes)
7. Re: Spit Carb part missing - WANTED (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2001 08:27:41 -0700; I think that's what I said (although not so elaborately) :) Joe /// /// triumphs@autox.team.net mailing list ///; /html/triumphs/2001-01/msg01420.html (8,829 bytes)
8. Re: Spit Carb part missing - WANTED (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2001 21:18:27 FILETIME=[5BBB6F80:01C08714]; Dave, Oh I fooled around with them newfangled things... One can carry modernization too far... Man, just the thought of a Lucas nuclear reactor give me the willies somethin' fierce. I'll just stick; /html/triumphs/2001-01/msg01435.html (9,636 bytes)
9. Re: Spit Carb part missing - WANTED (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2001 21:38:19 -0500; Message text written by "Greg Petrolatti" Speaking of modernization, the wife just got a 1992 model Morgan and it is essentially the same design as the 1950 model she also has. Same lever suspension,; /html/triumphs/2001-01/msg01447.html (8,465 bytes)
10. Re: Spit Carb part missing - WANTED (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2001 21:38:12 -0500; Message text written by Joe Curry JOe < And who let you out? (woof, woof, woof) Dave /// /// triumphs@autox.team.net mailing list ///; /html/triumphs/2001-01/msg01448.html (8,064 bytes)
11. Re: Spit Carb part missing - WANTED (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2001 19:53:18 -0700; Yeah, oldest dog in the kennel! Joe /// /// triumphs@autox.team.net mailing list ///; /html/triumphs/2001-01/msg01449.html (8,399 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]