Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Spit\s+electronic\s+ignition\s+and\s+coil\s+ballast\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Spit\s+electronic\s+ignition\s+and\s+coil\s+ballast\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Spit electronic ignition and coil ballast (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 17:19:45 -0400; I hope this isn't a repeat message. I think I did something wrong on my first attempt. Apologies if you get it twice. From what I can tell by past posts on this topic, I may be one of the few out the; /html/triumphs/2001-04/msg00009.html (8,341 bytes)
2. Re: Spit electronic ignition and coil ballast (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 00:42:01 +0100; Hi Tim I think based on my knowledge of other Triumphs that by 1980 your car would have had the ballast wire buried in the loom, that is if the electronic ignition required a ballast at all. I suspec; /html/triumphs/2001-04/msg00015.html (8,296 bytes)
3. Re: Spit electronic ignition and coil ballast (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2001 16:42:50 -0400; Thanks for the replies to my questions. As it turns out, I "fixed" it last night. But, I wasn't a good experimentalist in that I tried two things at once and don't know which, if either, is responsib; /html/triumphs/2001-04/msg00109.html (8,260 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]