Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Spitfire\s+Facts\s+\&\s+Figures\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Spitfire\s+Facts\s+\&\s+Figures\s*$/: 19 ]

Total 19 documents matching your query.

1. Spitfire Facts & Figures (score: 1): Author: "Suzie" <suzie_bear@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2000 22:45:58 -0000; This month's edition of Club Torque, the Club Triumph magazine included a bunch of figures including home & export quantities & chassis numbers for each mark. I'm rather confused as they quote the fi; /html/spitfires/2000-03/msg00919.html (7,942 bytes)
2. Re: Spitfire Facts & Figures (score: 1): Author: Laura.G@141.com (Laura Gharazeddine); Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2000 15:14:47 -0800; Sounds like a question for Curry and Mace! (Using alphabetical billing...) Laura; /html/spitfires/2000-03/msg00922.html (8,685 bytes)
3. Re: Spitfire Facts & Figures (score: 1): Author: Joe Curry <spitlist@gte.net>; Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2000 16:56:34 -0700; I don't know where they got their data, but THe BMIHT has the Mk3 listed as follows: Jan 1967 FD4 through Dec 1970 FD92803 (FD1 through FD3 were not found in their records) It might be noted that ne; /html/spitfires/2000-03/msg00924.html (9,078 bytes)
4. Re: Spitfire Facts & Figures (score: 1): Author: "Jeff McNeal" <jmcneal@ohms.com>; Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2000 16:03:18 -0800; Your answer is contained in your statement. The first "set" of Mk3 chassis numbers. Looks like Baby Blue was in the second set, maybe? Cheers, Jeff in San Diego FD 8862 -- Original Message -- From:; /html/spitfires/2000-03/msg00928.html (8,956 bytes)
5. Re: Spitfire Facts & Figures (score: 1): Author: Joe Curry <spitlist@gte.net>; Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2000 20:27:29 -0700; == Make that 1 and "2"!!! Joe -- "If you can't excel with talent, triumph with effort." -- Dave Weinbaum in National Enquirer; /html/spitfires/2000-03/msg00950.html (9,001 bytes)
6. Re: Spitfire Facts & Figures (score: 1): Author: Andrew Mace <amace@unix2.nysed.gov>; Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2000 22:54:59 -0500 (EST); I have data that suggests that FD15302 was the first Spitfire manufactured in calendar year (not model year) 1968. So perhaps all that was meant by "first set" is those cars manufactured in calendar; /html/spitfires/2000-03/msg00953.html (10,446 bytes)
7. Re: Spitfire Facts & Figures (score: 1): Author: Joe Curry <spitlist@gte.net>; Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2000 22:15:22 -0700; Since we are on the subject, I'll just go ahead and share the entire list of the Mk3 and MkIV I got from the BMIHT. You can draw from it whatever conclusions you will! MK3 == Jan 67 First Mk3 Prefix:; /html/spitfires/2000-03/msg00956.html (12,801 bytes)
8. Re: Spitfire Facts & Figures (score: 1): Author: SJagGo@aol.com; Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2000 01:29:20 EST; Hi Joe, Do you have the data for the FM 1500's? Bill Brockschmidt; /html/spitfires/2000-03/msg00957.html (8,149 bytes)
9. Re: Spitfire Facts & Figures (score: 1): Author: Tom Jell <thomas.jell@mchp.siemens.de>; Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2000 08:27:12 +0100 (MET); as being from FD1 - FD15306. Does that mean that I've spent all that money on a non-existent car as Baby Blue is FD16410? That's really interesting. My sources also show no 16k range. Is it possible; /html/spitfires/2000-03/msg00958.html (10,234 bytes)
10. Re: Spitfire Facts & Figures (score: 1): Author: "Suzie" <suzie_bear@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2000 08:46:00 -0000; The actual figures they quoted were as follows: Mk I: FC1 - FC44656 Mk II: FC5001 - FC88904 Mk III: FD1 - FD15306 FD20000 - FD515967 FD75000 - FD92803 Mk IV: FH3 - FH64995 1500: FH75001 on FM28001 on; /html/spitfires/2000-03/msg00963.html (10,391 bytes)
11. RE: Spitfire Facts & Figures (score: 1): Author: "Mitchell, Douglas (D.B.)" <dmitchel@ford.com>; Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2000 07:51:14 -0500; Well, whoever wrote the article sure didn't do their homework. They claim that the US based 1500 start at FM28001? Bzzzzzt. Wrong. Now maybe for 1975 when BL introduced the 1500 to the rest of the wo; /html/spitfires/2000-03/msg00969.html (11,979 bytes)
12. Re: Spitfire Facts & Figures (score: 1): Author: Barry Schwartz <bschwart@pacbell.net>; Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2000 06:45:22 -0800; < snip > < snip > ** I must have *one* of the earliest 72's around - Cool, this must mean that my Spitfire (FK31049U) was the seventy first car down the line. Not that the 72 is anything to be notewo; /html/spitfires/2000-03/msg00977.html (8,687 bytes)
13. Re: Spitfire Facts & Figures (score: 1): Author: Joe Curry <spitlist@gte.net>; Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2000 08:00:50 -0700; See comments between the lines below: These are from the BMIHT! Correct FC50001 to FC88912 FD4 to FD16515 FD20000 to FD51949 (with FDU's mixed in) Correct Yes, but with some missing numbers at the en; /html/spitfires/2000-03/msg00979.html (9,738 bytes)
14. Re: Spitfire Facts & Figures (score: 1): Author: SJagGo@aol.com; Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2000 10:20:03 EST; One of my 1500's body numbers is 19FM. I believe its commission # is FM487UE. Bill Brockschmidt; /html/spitfires/2000-03/msg00984.html (8,035 bytes)
15. Re: Spitfire Facts & Figures (score: 1): Author: Andrew Mace <amace@unix2.nysed.gov>; Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2000 10:41:31 -0500 (); Oops, look again at the line ABOVE the line you quoted: Sep 71 First 72 Model Prefix: FH/FK/FL Serial #: 25001 [Jan 72 First car in 72 Prefix: FH/FK/FL Serial #: 30978....] Yours might have been the; /html/spitfires/2000-03/msg00986.html (8,749 bytes)
16. Re: Spitfire Facts & Figures (score: 1): Author: "Suzie" <suzie_bear@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2000 10:50:23 -0000; Those are the figures on the Log Book and I checked with the numbers on the car. They match. It is the only FD16* on the International Spitfire Database http://home1.gte.net/spitlist/ but I made sure; /html/spitfires/2000-03/msg01016.html (11,467 bytes)
17. Re: Spitfire Facts & Figures (score: 1): Author: Joe Curry <spitlist@gte.net>; Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2000 11:44:32 -0700; Suzie Bear, I wouldn't be overly concerned about that. It is obvious to me that the source of the info that you cite is lacking details, accuracy and as a result credibility. But to be sure, the BMIH; /html/spitfires/2000-03/msg01021.html (11,639 bytes)
18. Re: Spitfire Facts & Figures (score: 1): Author: Laura.G@141.com (Laura Gharazeddine); Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2000 10:38:39 -0800; Well, if you know the 'birth order' thatis, that you're car was the seventy first, what does that say about it's personality? Laura (First off my mum's assembly line!) Vita brevis est: rapide agite,; /html/spitfires/2000-03/msg01028.html (8,946 bytes)
19. Re: Spitfire Facts & Figures (score: 1): Author: "Suzie" <suzie_bear@hotmail.com>; Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2000 09:48:33 -0000; Thanks for the corrections, it's nice to know my car *does* officially Suzie production; /html/spitfires/2000-03/msg01072.html (10,153 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 19
Page: [1]