Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Spitfire\s+coils\s+\-\s+superfluous\s+information\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Spitfire\s+coils\s+\-\s+superfluous\s+information\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Spitfire coils - superfluous information (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sat, 3 Jan 1998 19:50:06 EST; Charlie, I would not think so. Under running conditions, the ballasted coil would pull roughly the same current as a non-ballasted coil, in order to provide the same spark energy. It would be approxi; /html/triumphs/1998-01/msg00126.html (7,984 bytes)
2. Re: Spitfire coils - superfluous information (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sat, 3 Jan 1998 19:50:05 EST; Tom: There is still one other potential problem to be concerned about, or at least I've been told. If the points are completely open, or completely closed, there should be no problem. The problem occ; /html/triumphs/1998-01/msg00127.html (7,976 bytes)
3. Re: Spitfire coils - superfluous information (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sat, 3 Jan 1998 21:57:04 -0500charset="iso-8859-1"; In order to generate the same spark energy (watts) the 12 volt coil would draw only half the current of a 6V coil. Amps times volts equal watts. Moreover, since you're still applying 12 volts to the; /html/triumphs/1998-01/msg00136.html (9,111 bytes)
4. Re: Spitfire coils - superfluous information (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sun, 4 Jan 1998 15:45:50 EST; energy George, Whoops! ya got me. You're right on all counts. My OF synapses misfired a couple of times on this one. I mixed my apples and my oranges, didn't I? I usually stew a while over my posts b; /html/triumphs/1998-01/msg00174.html (9,267 bytes)
5. Re: Spitfire coils - superfluous information (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sun, 4 Jan 1998 19:07:20 -0500charset="iso-8859-1"; Sorry Dan, but bad postings don't qualify you for the idiot of the year. I heard there was some talk of "Virtual idiot of the year", but when they looked back at all posts, it was a dead heat between; /html/triumphs/1998-01/msg00189.html (9,120 bytes)
6. Spitfire coils - superfluous information (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 31 Dec 1997 11:01:18 EST; Joe, Charlie, and others: This weekend, whilst visiting the B&N bookstore in Marietta, GA, I picked up a copy of "Triumph Spitfire and GT6 - A Guide To Originality," by John Thompson. I own neither a; /html/triumphs/1997-12/msg01578.html (12,559 bytes)
7. Re: Spitfire coils - superfluous information (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 31 Dec 1997 16:59:23 -0500; Good solid information as usual. I'm gonna guess Triumph probably used the ceramic resistor for one model year--'72(?). Before that there was none, after that they found they could save money by inc; /html/triumphs/1997-12/msg01596.html (8,170 bytes)
8. Re: Spitfire coils - superfluous information (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 31 Dec 1997 19:24:00 GMT; Good info! I've often wondered how a points ignition car would behave with the ignition "on", and stalled with points *closed*. Years ago we were advised not to leave the car in this state too long.; /html/triumphs/1997-12/msg01604.html (14,138 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]