Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Spitfires\s+in\s+SCCA\s+FP\/GP\s+Classes\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Spitfires\s+in\s+SCCA\s+FP\/GP\s+Classes\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Spitfires in SCCA FP/GP Classes (score: 1): Author: EISANDIEGO@aol.com; Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2002 14:45:28 EDT; I was surprised to see in the SCCA Sportscar race results that Spitfires are often still among the top finishers/winners in these classes. Cary; /html/fot/2002-08/msg00037.html (6,616 bytes)
2. Re: Spitfires in SCCA FP/GP Classes (score: 1): Author: "Glen" <fubog@beon.net>; Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2002 15:02:43 -0400; Yes but it is also sadly true that SCCA has railroaded most of the old brit prod cars out of those classes by means of constant rules changes. No manufacturer anymore = no support $$ or contingencies; /html/fot/2002-08/msg00038.html (7,432 bytes)
3. Re: Spitfires in SCCA FP/GP Classes (score: 1): Author: EISANDIEGO@aol.com; Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2002 15:18:43 EDT; Glen, I hate to be the one who tells you this, but just being associated with Triumphs has certain implications about one's status as an Old Fart. Around Southern California, the hot ticket is highly; /html/fot/2002-08/msg00039.html (7,199 bytes)
4. Re: Spitfires in SCCA FP/GP Classes (score: 1): Author: Joe Curry <spitlist@gte.net>; Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2002 13:15:29 -0700; But since the engine was virtually new when I got it and is highly reliable coupled with the fact that I can't even get all 240 horses to hook up to the pavement, I have forgone doing any further mod; /html/fot/2002-08/msg00040.html (7,447 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]