- 1. Re: Spridget Safety rant again.. (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 10:57:17 -0500
- Ok, just to make a point, you are talking about a car 20 years NEWER than a Bugeye. And the safety designs you speak of were implemented years before that in SAABs as well as several others. To think
- /html/spridgets/2005-04/msg00992.html (9,067 bytes)
- 2. Re: Spridget Safety rant again.. (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 22:56:14 GMT j3PMuYNP020913
- "can you say metal fatigue" LOL....absolutely, Lester!! But this seems to be a factor for pressurized aircraft mostly, in my field anyway. For the unpressurized set..... the guys at Old Rhinebeck are
- /html/spridgets/2005-04/msg01031.html (9,640 bytes)
- 3. Re: Spridget Safety rant again.. (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 18:47:56 -0700 (PDT)
- I won't comment on what my son(s) will drive starting in 3 short years, but after seeing the carnage the very nice kid across the street did to the family Jeep Cherokee last week (first he brushed a
- /html/spridgets/2005-04/msg01045.html (7,297 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu