Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Springs\s+options\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Springs\s+options\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Springs options (score: 1): Author: "Bruce" <brichards@fineeyes.com>; Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 16:37:49 -0500; Sorry to open Pandora s box on suspension, but here I go. I am having some work done to my Tiger, one of the things my mechanic is doing is replacing all of the 40 year old rubber in the suspension.; /html/tigers/2006-10/msg00088.html (8,154 bytes)
2. Re: Springs options (score: 1): Author: MWood24020@aol.com; Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 17:42:26 EDT; I think the springs that Rick at Sunbeam Specialties has (had?) would be a good "middle ground"...IIRC, about 350#? Also, Rob Guerra has new leaf springs that work very well. Get a set of adjustable; /html/tigers/2006-10/msg00089.html (7,092 bytes)
3. Re: Springs options (score: 1): Author: RMEbstein@aol.com; Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 17:53:20 EDT; CAT made some front coil springs that were rated at 335 lbs back in the late 80's or early 90's. I actually have a set of NIB (new-in-box) CAT front springs that I would be willing to part with, if y; /html/tigers/2006-10/msg00090.html (7,433 bytes)
4. Re: Springs options (score: 1): Author: Steve Laifman <SLaifman@socal.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 15:09:55 -0700; Have you considered that either front spring changed ride height (age or purpose), or you have non stock tire width, diameter, or wheel offset? ___ Steve Laifman Editor - TigersUnited.com; /html/tigers/2006-10/msg00092.html (7,407 bytes)
5. Re: Springs options (score: 1): Author: CoolVT@aol.com; Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 21:27:39 EDT; One thing to check on the Cat springs is that many were short. The originals that I took out of the car were about 12" unloaded and the Cat ones I purchased were 10 1/2" Mark L.; /html/tigers/2006-10/msg00094.html (7,076 bytes)
6. Re: Springs options (score: 1): Author: Theo Smit <theo.smit@dynastream.com>; Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 22:32:44 -0600; The unloaded length of a higher rate spring must be shorter than the unloaded length of the stock spring, otherwise the car would sit higher off the ground when you put the higher-rate springs in. Su; /html/tigers/2006-10/msg00097.html (7,623 bytes)
7. Re: Springs options (score: 1): Author: CoolVT@aol.com; Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 07:42:28 EDT; I can tell you that in my case, the shorter springs dropped the front end. The car looked like it was running down hill. The advantage was that with the downhill attitude and resulting lessened wind; /html/tigers/2006-10/msg00098.html (7,030 bytes)
8. RE: Springs options (score: 1): Author: "Robert Palmer" <rpalmerbob@adelphia.net>; Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 07:18:23 -0700; My recollection is that the complaint was the ride was too high, so it was recommended to leave out the rubber donut cushion - then it rode too low. But not all springs of the same rate are equal an; /html/tigers/2006-10/msg00099.html (7,382 bytes)
9. RE: Springs options (score: 1): Author: " Ron Fraser" <rfraser@bluefrog.com>; Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 10:56:06 -0400; I tried a couple different springs on my Tiger, I don't remember the make or spring rate, and I did not like the stiffer ride they gave. I went back to the original springs that came on the car and; /html/tigers/2006-10/msg00100.html (9,021 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]