Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Stax\s+front\s+and\s+rear\s+shock\s+conversion\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Stax\s+front\s+and\s+rear\s+shock\s+conversion\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Stax front and rear shock conversion (score: 1): Author: Enrique Claure <spaninc@ceibo.entelnet.bo>; Date: Sun, 05 Dec 1999 12:15:19 -0400; Hi list, when I started my project 77B I thought performance was first on my list. I changed the standard shocks in rear and front for the tube shock conversion. I am not so sure I did a good thing f; /html/mgs/1999-12/msg00236.html (6,987 bytes)
2. Re: Stax front and rear shock conversion (score: 1): Author: "James H. Nazarian" <microdoc@apk.net>; Date: Sun, 05 Dec 1999 16:53:25 -0500; I did the conversion on my 74 MGB-GT about 10 years ago. I changed to new springs front and rear at the same time. The ride was very stiff, very, very stiff. It handled with great precision and cont; /html/mgs/1999-12/msg00247.html (7,774 bytes)
3. Re: Stax front and rear shock conversion (score: 1): Author: Max Heim <mvheim@studiolimage.com>; Date: Sun, 5 Dec 1999 14:41:13 -0800; I can't really see why you'd regret a tube shock conversion, unless it is that the SPAX shocks are too stiff for your liking and adversely affect the ride quality. The benefits of tube shocks over le; /html/mgs/1999-12/msg00248.html (8,557 bytes)
4. Re: Stax front and rear shock conversion (score: 1): Author: "Paul Hunt" <paul.hunt1@virgin.net>; Date: Mon, 6 Dec 1999 08:51:12 -0000; I've got the ones with the adjuster screw on the back (standard at the front). When I first bought the car they were very hard indeed, adjusting to the softest setting was OK. Had to replace them and; /html/mgs/1999-12/msg00261.html (7,646 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]