Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Stock\s+reclassification\?\?\?\?\s+I\s+Stock\s+lives\?\?\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Stock\s+reclassification\?\?\?\?\s+I\s+Stock\s+lives\?\?\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Stock reclassification???? I Stock lives??? (score: 1): Author: Mike Shields <mshields@inconnect.com>; Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2000 15:27:00 -0600; I just saw another post lamenting the probable demise of H-Stock. What I didn't realize until then is that if the SCCA _did_ add another class we'd finally get the much sought after I-Stock. Mike Mik; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00107.html (6,846 bytes)
2. RE: Stock reclassification???? I Stock lives??? (score: 1): Author: "Linnhoff, Eric" <elinnhoff@smmc.saint-lukes.org>; Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2000 16:32:38 -0500; I just saw another post lamenting the probable demise of H-Stock. What I didn't realize until then is that if the SCCA _did_ add another class we'd finally get the much sought after I-Stock. == That'; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00109.html (7,234 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]