Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Street\s+Mod\s+exclusions\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Street\s+Mod\s+exclusions\s*$/: 36 ]

Total 36 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Street Mod exclusions (score: 1): Author: "Matt Murray" <mattm@optonline.net>; Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2000 08:22:08 -0500; So looking your statement, perhaps the Supra should never have been let in in the first place. Looking at the results, your margin of winning was larger than ESP (SM 1.422, ESP 1.066).; /html/autox/2000-12/msg00074.html (8,032 bytes)
2. Re: Street Mod exclusions (score: 1): Author: "kent rafferty" <gs96@sgi.net>; Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2000 11:13:03 -0500; That's my husband's margin, not mine. Most SM watchers expect the fully prepped SM RX3s, Civics, and M3s to have their way with the 3400 lb overdog Supra in the future. I don't think there were to ma; /html/autox/2000-12/msg00075.html (9,109 bytes)
3. Re: Street Mod exclusions (score: 1): Author: Smokerbros@aol.com; Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2000 12:43:50 EST; Would anyone fear a Toyota Starlet, or VW Bug? San Francisco Region's Open Street Prepared has some very fast ones. A 1500 lb Starlet with a 200 HP motor, and built to SM rules (OSP is a little more; /html/autox/2000-12/msg00078.html (8,163 bytes)
4. Re: Street Mod exclusions (score: 1): Author: "Matt Murray" <mattm@optonline.net>; Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2000 12:45:28 -0500; Hey, both names start with a "K". I suppose people want me to *actually* read the posts correctly? :^) What's wrong with hearsay, innuendo, and rumors? The facts can just get in the way. :^) Nonethel; /html/autox/2000-12/msg00079.html (10,571 bytes)
5. Re: Street Mod exclusions (score: 1): Author: "msmith2" <msmith2@columbus.rr.com>; Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2000 13:02:05 -0500; They might fear it, but the starlet and others of it's kind are part of the SM makeup. If one blows the class off, you have to look at WHAT it blew off. If the 2nd place car wasn't even half-way thru; /html/autox/2000-12/msg00082.html (9,062 bytes)
6. Re: Street Mod exclusions (score: 1): Author: Smokerbros@aol.com; Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2000 13:09:01 EST; I'd fear the Starlet more, due to a 500 lb weight difference, smaller size, rear coil springs, and a better low end torque curve. I'm guessing all the cars I mentioned are pretty scarce... I've run C; /html/autox/2000-12/msg00085.html (8,416 bytes)
7. RE: Street Mod exclusions (score: 1): Author: "Kevin Stevens" <Kevin_Stevens@Bigfoot.com>; Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2000 12:48:05 -0800; Here's the link to the SM proposed INclusion list, you can pretty much see the answer to your question there. http://www.legendaryslack.com/inclusion.html Alternatively, they were proposing minimum; /html/autox/2000-12/msg00091.html (9,624 bytes)
8. Re: Street Mod exclusions (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2000 15:18:55 -0600; pretty much see the http://www.legendaryslack.com/inclusion.html Interesting. It would be nice if the person who struck through the excluded cars and typed in the excuses ...errr, reasons ... actuall; /html/autox/2000-12/msg00093.html (9,429 bytes)
9. Re: Street Mod exclusions (score: 1): Author: Karl Witt <witt@mediaone.net>; Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2000 17:28:21 -0500; At 03:18 PM 12/2/2000 -0600, Jay Mitchell did say: wow! a WHOLE 2000 pounds? i mean really...that's a heavy car. NOT. Anyway. As far as the list as a whole, it was done EXTREMELY quickly and incomple; /html/autox/2000-12/msg00098.html (9,318 bytes)
10. Re: Street Mod exclusions (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2000 16:31:43 -0600; NOT. So how, then, do you justify allowing Honda Civics in SM? Lots of them weigh less than 2k. My '86 VW GTI in ES-legal trim weighed just over 2100, which is no more than any of the excluded "rare,; /html/autox/2000-12/msg00100.html (9,663 bytes)
11. Re: Street Mod exclusions (score: 1): Author: "Larry Steckel" <lorenzoscribe@hotmail.com>; Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2000 20:20:03 -0500; Hey don't discount the Triumph Herald. It's a legitimate four seater. where do you think they got the chassis for the Spitfire? How about taking a Herald, dropping in a 3.5 litre V/8 from a Triumph T; /html/autox/2000-12/msg00103.html (11,149 bytes)
12. Re: Street Mod exclusions (score: 1): Author: "kent rafferty" <gs96@sgi.net>; Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2000 20:23:26 -0500; The SM Exclusion List is very early in its development. Models that are included may be excluded. Cars that are excluded may be included. Very premature. Did I mention we just started this process? S; /html/autox/2000-12/msg00104.html (10,383 bytes)
13. Re: Street Mod exclusions (score: 1): Author: "Larry R. Metz" <lrmetz@home.com>; Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2000 20:31:23 -0500; It sorts of sounds like the street mod new classes.....I thought they were created because of the extreme cars in the present mod. classes, but now these rules will create just another class of very; /html/autox/2000-12/msg00105.html (11,718 bytes)
14. Re: Street Mod exclusions (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2000 19:46:21 -0600; Yep. Front engine, RWD, Chrysler 383, real 2 + 2 seating. Curb weight 4020 lb. (R&T, October 1973). 10.4 sec. 0-60. Definitely no threat to SM. Jay; /html/autox/2000-12/msg00106.html (8,663 bytes)
15. Re: Street Mod exclusions (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2000 19:56:39 -0600; I wasn't. It's on the SM excluded list, however, along with Shelby Cobras. Presumably to keep the world safe for DSMs, ponycars, and "non-sports-car-derived" vehicles. Whatever they are. Yep. Definit; /html/autox/2000-12/msg00107.html (9,913 bytes)
16. Re: Street Mod exclusions (score: 1): Author: "kent rafferty" <gs96@sgi.net>; Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2000 22:45:15 -0500; I wouldn't know a Triumph Herald if it ran me over - and since Larry is from my region that's not out of the realm of possibility :-) I imagine it was initially excluded because Triumphs are typicall; /html/autox/2000-12/msg00108.html (8,816 bytes)
17. Re: Street Mod exclusions (score: 1): Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>; Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2000 23:00:15 -0500 (EST); But ESP is far from a new class. _EVERYONE_ that I've talked to about SM agrees with me that a CSP civic will do well, even if you don't add power. But, nobody's built one yet. Then there's all the; /html/autox/2000-12/msg00109.html (9,090 bytes)
18. Re: Street Mod exclusions (score: 1): Author: Pat Kelly <lollipop@ricochet.net>; Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2000 19:38:49 -0800; And then there's the Triumph TR-10! Last year of manufacture: 1959. The reason I mention it, it's the only source for stock rear ends for Lotus 7As. :-) We have three samples. A very ugly awkward sed; /html/autox/2000-12/msg00110.html (9,286 bytes)
19. Re: Street Mod exclusions (score: 1): Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>; Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2000 23:17:46 -0500 (EST); Gee, do ya think? Who won the class this year? Mark (I bit more seriously... Were there any class champs this year that drove vs. trailered?); /html/autox/2000-12/msg00114.html (9,024 bytes)
20. Re: Street Mod exclusions (score: 1): Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>; Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2000 23:22:09 -0500 (EST); Hey, I just thought of something that would simplify the SM list. If the car model wasn't made after 1985, exclude it. Mark (particularly given that I don't think SM's goal is to attract the one guy; /html/autox/2000-12/msg00115.html (8,908 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]