Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Stupid\s+bumper\s+question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Stupid\s+bumper\s+question\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Stupid bumper question (score: 1): Author: "Frank Marrone" <marrone@wco.com>; Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2001 20:52:03 -0800; Is there any difference between an Alpine bumper and a Tiger bumper? Are the overriders and mounting brackets the same? Specifically the rear bumper. I call this a stupid question because I'm fairly; /html/tigers/2001-12/msg00017.html (7,254 bytes)
2. Re: Stupid bumper question (score: 1): Author: RockStar30cars@aol.com; Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2001 00:23:24 EST; Hello Frank, front bumpers are the same, so as in Alpine and Tiger. You listed it as a Tiger which was an Alpine first and modified with the V8. Alvin (TopDogRover) I'll be in Vegas in April.; /html/tigers/2001-12/msg00018.html (7,124 bytes)
3. Re: Stupid bumper question (score: 1): Author: Steve Laifman <SLaifman@SoCal.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2001 08:35:36 -0800; There is a significant difference. The Alpine bumpers are bolted to Alpines, and the Tiger bumper are on Tigers. (8-) If they are off the car, you will not find any differences. BUT there ARE differ; /html/tigers/2001-12/msg00021.html (7,419 bytes)
4. Re: Stupid bumper question (score: 1): Author: DJoh797014@aol.com; Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2001 12:02:30 EST; Some of the bumper confusion may be caused by the US made Chrysler replacement bumpers. They have more rounded ends than the more tapered British made bumpers. You'll see what I mean it you can put t; /html/tigers/2001-12/msg00024.html (7,388 bytes)
5. Re: Stupid bumper question (score: 1): Author: Steve Laifman <SLaifman@SoCal.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2001 14:58:25 -0800; I see no cause for fear about the nearness of the rear mounting nuts to the gas(oline?) pipes. The SU fuel joints and seals are just over the muffler. Besides, these bumpers and overriders are NOT m; /html/tigers/2001-12/msg00025.html (8,018 bytes)
6. Re: Stupid bumper question (score: 1): Author: DJoh797014@aol.com; Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2001 22:59:46 EST; If I made an anti-social comment, I was unaware of it. But I'll take it back if anyone is offended. But being from a conservative background, a socialist is almost a (dare I say the C word) Communis; /html/tigers/2001-12/msg00034.html (7,649 bytes)
7. Re: Stupid bumper question (score: 1): Author: MrZAG57@aol.com; Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2001 23:32:13 EST; << Drink grain alcohol only. >> I agree with George when he said....... I asked my Daddy why he called his brew White Lightin' stead of Mountain Dew, I took one swug, right away I knew as my face tur; /html/tigers/2001-12/msg00035.html (7,403 bytes)
8. Re: Stupid bumper question (score: 1): Author: RockStar30cars@aol.com; Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 00:20:17 EST; I was just kidding with the seller of the bumpers, the brackets were the only difference I knew of until the Chrysler take over. The extra ones I have, before I put them away I sprayed them with unde; /html/tigers/2001-12/msg00038.html (7,530 bytes)
9. Re: Stupid bumper question (score: 1): Author: SFordRB@aol.com; Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 13:44:30 EST; I got it, being from The Socialists Republic of Ca. Sean/Dr. Moonstone; /html/tigers/2001-12/msg00130.html (7,043 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]