Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Su\s+vs\.\s+Weber\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Su\s+vs\.\s+Weber\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. SU vs. Weber (score: 1): Author: "Thomas James Pokrefke, III" <pokrefke@bigun.c-gate.net>; Date: Mon, 29 Jun 1998 18:47:09 -0500; I saw someone suggest an SU upgrade over a Weber within the last couple of posts. I feel as if I am imminently qualified to make the following observations, although YMMV. I bought a used Weber 32/36; /html/mgs/1998-06/msg01842.html (8,074 bytes)
2. RE: SU vs. Weber (score: 1): Author: "doug russell" <dr-doug@classic.msn.com>; Date: Tue, 30 Jun 98 15:12:02 UT; Thomas James Pokrefke, III in a moment of witty reflection noted: Of course, the Weber was only marginally better than laying a gasoline-soaked shop rag on the intake manifold. Thanks for the imagery; /html/mgs/1998-06/msg01854.html (6,501 bytes)
3. Su vs. Weber (score: 1): Author: Graham Knight <graham@disr.den.mmc.com>; Date: Tue, 12 Sep 95 10:32:29 MDT; Hi folks, Well, it seems that the delegation is split on the SU vs. Weber debate. I got mail from folks who swear by the Webers, and others who say they are junk. Same story on the SU's. Frankly, i'm; /html/mgs/1995-09/msg00201.html (8,360 bytes)
4. Re: Su vs. Weber (score: 1): Author: "Christopher W. Reichle" <Christopher.W.Reichle@students.Miami.EDU>; Date: Tue, 12 Sep 1995 14:41:14 -0400 (EDT); Try Pierce Manifolds 1 800 874 3728 I hear that is where Moss gets their kits.; /html/mgs/1995-09/msg00203.html (9,082 bytes)
5. Re: Su vs. Weber (score: 1): Author: craig@wco.com (craig wiper); Date: Tue, 12 Sep 1995 20:20:21 -0700; -- 303-977-7085 -- Pierce manifold. It has a normal choke i.e. (with a cable). If you want it you can have it for around $300.00. I took it off at smog time and put the old SU HIF4's back on. I like; /html/mgs/1995-09/msg00209.html (8,176 bytes)
6. Re: Su vs. Weber (score: 1): Author: brooked@bre.co.uk; Date: Wed, 13 Sep 1995 09:18:03 EDT; Well Graham, its obvious from you last mail that you want to fit a Weber - but I don't like you logic about the sealing... Now correct me if I'm wrong but the Weber must have as many potential like s; /html/mgs/1995-09/msg00218.html (7,650 bytes)
7. Re: Su vs. Weber (score: 1): Author: "A. B. Bonds" <ab@vuse.vanderbilt.edu>; Date: 13 Sep 1995 09:02:54 -0500; And replies there will be, as this is one of same. First we ought to make clear which Weber. My contribution (which somehow implies value, for which I apologize) is regarding the DGV manual choke dow; /html/mgs/1995-09/msg00227.html (8,915 bytes)
8. Re: Su vs. Weber (score: 1): Author: dodd@el.wpafb.af.mil (Mark A. Dodd, WL/ELOD, X55581/64158); Date: Wed, 13 Sep 95 12:05:17 EDT; As A.B. Bonds posted, it depends on which carb we are talking about. He addressed the lack of leakage points in a DGV. I would agree with his point. However, as a past DGV from a Zenith converter, t; /html/mgs/1995-09/msg00231.html (9,720 bytes)
9. Re: Su vs. Weber (score: 1): Author: "A. B. Bonds" <ab@vuse.vanderbilt.edu>; Date: 14 Sep 1995 09:33:20 -0500; In <9509131605.AA12832@el.wpafb.af.mil>, Mark A. Dodd, WL/ELOD, X55581/64158 Cannot emphasize this too much. The electric choke (DGEV) version is a swine. It sets the choke after the car has cooled d; /html/mgs/1995-09/msg00263.html (9,561 bytes)
10. Re: Su vs. Weber (score: 1): Author: Johnmowog@aol.com; Date: Tue, 19 Sep 1995 01:19:32 -0400; any number of places should be able to sell you rebuilt S.U.s for about $300-325, from the other prices you have quoted (weber) I would find a new shop or do mail order. University Motors, Apple Hydr; /html/mgs/1995-09/msg00422.html (7,430 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]