Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Subject\:\s+FW\:\s+carroll\s+Shelby\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Subject\:\s+FW\:\s+carroll\s+Shelby\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. Subject: FW: carroll Shelby (score: 1): Author: "Doug Leithauser" <dleit@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 15:55:32 -0500; The Cobra, prior to the 427, was little more than an ancient AC Ace from the hanging-by-the-skin-of-it's-teeth AC Cars, with an already obsolete Ford 221cid V8, then the obsolete 260, then finally th; /html/tigers/2005-01/msg00286.html (8,129 bytes)
2. RE: Subject: FW: Carroll Shelby (score: 1): Author: Dave Munroe <dave@munroe.ca>; Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 18:14:42 -0400; Just to add some fuel to the fire: Here is a clip from A Barrett-Jackson Scottsdale 2005 Press Release: "A vintage Shelby G.T.500 fastback set a world record at last year's Scottsdale auction with a; /html/tigers/2005-01/msg00288.html (9,675 bytes)
3. Re: Subject: FW: carroll Shelby (score: 1): Author: Drmoonstone@aol.com; Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 20:14:47 EST; Everybody keeps referring to the 260 as obsolete. It wasn't at the time, it was part of a rapidly expanding engine line representing a new concept of engines. But then again I still like the obsolete; /html/tigers/2005-01/msg00311.html (8,022 bytes)
4. Re: Subject: FW: carroll Shelby (score: 1): Author: <arado7@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 20:43:44 -0500; All of this talk on the topic of the Shelby connection to the Tiger is interesting. I find it counterproductive in that if the Tiger reaches the value of Shelby Fords and Cobras I will no longer enjo; /html/tigers/2005-01/msg00312.html (8,067 bytes)
5. Re: Subject: FW: carroll Shelby (score: 1): Author: Steve Laifman <SLaifman@socal.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 05:06:29 -0800; When my car becomes "too expensive to dive", I just look at that new Ford GT, and it's comparatively lower cost to "furrin' imports". I would still like to own it. It isn't the cost of a car that wo; /html/tigers/2005-01/msg00325.html (8,731 bytes)
6. Re: Subject: FW: carroll Shelby (score: 1): Author: Drmoonstone@aol.com; Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 17:45:33 EST; Couldn't disagree more. If you are afraid to drive it because the value goes up then sell it. The Tiger is meant to be driven, that is the true value of any car, plane or boat. My grandfather told me; /html/tigers/2005-01/msg00327.html (8,202 bytes)
7. Re: Subject: FW: carroll Shelby (score: 1): Author: <arado7@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 18:58:09 -0500; Not afraid to drive mine. However, one of the things I liked when I acquired my Tiger in 1985 was the people who owned them. Went to the Indy race grounds for the Sunbean United in 85 and discovered; /html/tigers/2005-01/msg00328.html (8,352 bytes)
8. Re: Subject: FW: carroll Shelby (score: 1): Author: "Doug Leithauser" <dleit@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 18:57:45 -0500; Gary, I think you make a good point. Most of the Cobras do not get driven, not necessarily because their owners would not like to drive them, but because the cost of insurance for road use is prohibi; /html/tigers/2005-01/msg00329.html (8,971 bytes)
9. RE: Subject: FW: carroll Shelby (score: 1): Author: <gharlowe@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 20:30:29 -0500; "Shelby wanted to race, and sold cars on the side so he could race more. Rootes wanted to sell cars, and raced on the side so he could sell more." The title of "poor man's Cobra" applies to the Tiger; /html/tigers/2005-01/msg00331.html (9,026 bytes)
10. RE: Subject: FW: carroll Shelby (score: 1): Author: "Jim Sylvester" <jim.sylvester@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 06:36:04 -0600; My only disagreement is with Graham's comment of the Tiger's "achieving its potential" only with modifications to push it beyond 164 bhp. By design (worsened by the Tiger's steering configuration), t; /html/tigers/2005-01/msg00334.html (10,440 bytes)
11. Re: Subject: FW: carroll Shelby (score: 1): Author: Steve Sage <fastsage@cox.net>; Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 07:31:08 -0700; Jim: Only four words and an & symbol are needed to disprove your theory: Jim Adams & Doan Spencer Regards, Steve Sage; /html/tigers/2005-01/msg00336.html (8,382 bytes)
12. Re: Subject: FW: carroll Shelby (score: 1): Author: Bill Martin <tigerfixer@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 08:44:54 -0800 (PST); Steve is correct and to those who just don't know. In 1965 three Tigers came in third in their respective divisions of SCCA B Produciton, Pacific, Mid Ohio and Central Florida. The Hollywood car won; /html/tigers/2005-01/msg00337.html (8,400 bytes)
13. Re: Subject: FW: carroll Shelby (score: 1): Author: MWood24020@aol.com; Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 12:36:13 EST; I agree with Bill. A Tiger, from the factory, may be an evil bit of kit, but with some thoughtful (sometimes even legal...) modifications can be made to go very quickly. Look to current vintage race; /html/tigers/2005-01/msg00340.html (7,766 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]