Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Sumps\/oil\s+pans\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Sumps\/oil\s+pans\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. Sumps/oil pans (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 20:19:59 -0800; What's the interchangeability of spridget sumps? thanks, Mark; /html/spridgets/2006-01/msg00684.html (6,322 bytes)
2. Re: Sumps/oil pans (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:37:07 -0500; Small crank vs large crank 1.75" (948/1098) vs 2" late 1098s/ & 1275s -- Frank Clarici Toms River, NJ; /html/spridgets/2006-01/msg00696.html (7,116 bytes)
3. Re: Sumps/oil pans (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 21:08:36 -0600; Even if you get the crank sizes to work, I don't think you can put a 1098 pan on a 1275 motor. The 1275 has more pronounced "waves" in one side to give more clearance for the rods. I suppose a 1275 s; /html/spridgets/2006-01/msg00710.html (7,140 bytes)
4. Re: Sumps/oil pans (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 19:18:27 -0800; Thanks. Doesn't anyone on this list every punch a hole in their sump? No, that's not why. I'm building a 1275 from parts to put into an MG TC until I can find/afford an XPAG engine. When I do (find t; /html/spridgets/2006-01/msg00712.html (7,365 bytes)
5. Re: Sumps/oil pans (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 21:40:36 -0600; Ah, 'fraid you'll have to go with the 1275 sump, then. A bit hard to find, but could be someone on the list has one. Try also this link: http://www.coloradoscca.org/prodcar/viewtopic.php?t=5488 Someo; /html/spridgets/2006-01/msg00715.html (7,268 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]