Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Super\-Maggot\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Super\-Maggot\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Super-Maggot? (score: 1): Author: WSpohn4@aol.com; Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 13:36:09 EST; Kelvin - interesting idea, but why waste a nice motor like that on a Magnette ;-)~ The crossflow heads with 4 ports do respond to injection, and indeed Tecalemit-Jackson (sp?) made a mechanical set-u; /html/mgs/2002-02/msg00261.html (7,639 bytes)
2. RE: Super-Maggot? (score: 1): Author: "Dodd, Kelvin" <doddk@mossmotors.com>; Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 10:59:18 -0800; Too difficult to cool the alloy V8? Because it is there? Something very disturbing happened in my childhood? New aftermarket cam for Dodge Cummins Turbo Diesel Mechanical Fuel Injection $100.00 Incr; /html/mgs/2002-02/msg00264.html (7,683 bytes)
3. Re: Super-Maggot? (score: 1): Author: WSpohn4@aol.com; Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 14:28:22 EST; Some engines have limits intentionally designed in, normally making them that much more reliable. It is a sad thought that the pushrod MG head was the best that the designers of the day chose to do -; /html/mgs/2002-02/msg00265.html (8,268 bytes)
4. Re: Super-Maggot? (score: 1): Author: Max Heim <mvheim@attbi.com>; Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2002 12:10:46 -0800; This doubtless was due to the fact that MG didn't get to design their own engines in the post-war period, but was stuck with whatever BMC's bean-counters doled out (except for the Twincam project, an; /html/mgs/2002-02/msg00266.html (7,189 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]