Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Supertrapp\s*$/: 21 ]

Total 21 documents matching your query.

1. Supertrapp (score: 1)
Author: "Larry Miller" <millerls@ado13.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 1999 13:53:25 -0700
Anybody ever play with a Supertrapp tunable muffler? Larry Miller http://www.ado13.com I can see your point, but I still think you're full of shit - Anonymous
/html/spridgets/1999-10/msg00143.html (7,649 bytes)

2. RE: Supertrapp (score: 1)
Author: BILL <billh@aaai.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 1999 14:23:10 -0700
I had one on my Sprite (4" dia.) but didn't have it running long enough to really play with it. My first impression with 10 discs was, LOUD!!. I pulled 4 discs out and it quieted down considerably.
/html/spridgets/1999-10/msg00150.html (8,491 bytes)

3. RE: Supertrapp (score: 1)
Author: "Hanna, Mark" <mhanna@ball.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 1999 15:26:09 -0600
Hi Larry , Vizard talks about it in his " Big Yellow Book " . I think that he preferred the RC-40 . I think that the Supertrapp looks cool though :-) Mark Hanna AN5
/html/spridgets/1999-10/msg00151.html (8,515 bytes)

4. Re: Supertrapp (score: 1)
Author: "Larry Miller" <millerls@ado13.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 1999 14:33:15 -0700
Did he prefer the RC-40 for sound or performance?, I suspect for Larry Miller http://www.ado13.com I can see your point, but I still think you're full of shit - Anonymous preferred
/html/spridgets/1999-10/msg00152.html (9,480 bytes)

5. Re: Supertrapp (score: 1)
Author: Mark Endicott <endicott@nashville.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Oct 1999 16:36:52 -0500
Larry, A few weeks ago I was on a road trip with about ten LBC's. Two of the cars had these mufflers. One was a "B" and the other was a TR6. They sound great and when I talked to the car owners they
/html/spridgets/1999-10/msg00154.html (8,949 bytes)

6. Re: Supertrapp (score: 1)
Author: Bryan Vandiver <Bryan.Vandiver@Eng.Sun.COM>
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 1999 15:55:34 -0700 (PDT)
I installed the RC-40 system on my bugeye. It was rated by Vizard as the best 'flowing' of all the systems he tested. Unfortunately the system only comes set up for the Mini, so I has to have some c
/html/spridgets/1999-10/msg00160.html (11,434 bytes)

7. Re: Supertrapp (score: 1)
Author: Lancer7676@aol.com
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 1999 19:20:44 EDT
<< I installed the RC-40 system on my bugeye. It was rated by Vizard as the best 'flowing' of all the systems he tested. >> I am looking at a $15.95 muffler with 2" inlet and outlet (Will use a step
/html/spridgets/1999-10/msg00161.html (8,999 bytes)

8. Re: Supertrapp (score: 1)
Author: Herb_Goede@amsinc.com
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 1999 18:04:27 -0600
Surprisingly, straight through is not usually the best flow - especially with small engines. Without some restriction/back pressure you lose torque. (I don't know exactly why but someone on the list
/html/spridgets/1999-10/msg00167.html (8,779 bytes)

9. Re: Supertrapp (score: 1)
Author: Bryan Vandiver <Bryan.Vandiver@Eng.Sun.COM>
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 1999 17:20:35 -0700 (PDT)
The RC-40 is actually 'straight through' too. I noticed this when I was putting the system together. But I think there is a lot more to it than that. The RC-40 system is 'tuned' specifically for the
/html/spridgets/1999-10/msg00168.html (9,810 bytes)

10. Re: Supertrapp (score: 1)
Author: JustBrits@aol.com
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 1999 20:34:00 EDT
<< That's why dynos were invented. >> Geez Herb, are you approaching "OFDom"??? You ARE 1000% correct in that 'back pressure' is a "requirement" for motors to develope the best "out put". er, maybe n
/html/spridgets/1999-10/msg00169.html (8,563 bytes)

11. Re: Supertrapp (score: 1)
Author: Ulix Goettsch <ulix@u.washington.edu>
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 1999 18:16:36 -0700 (PDT)
Vizard wrote that to get power out of it, you have to add so many disks that it is unbearably loud. If you remove disks until it is semi quiet, it is very restrictive. A racer on the Fiat list tried
/html/spridgets/1999-10/msg00173.html (10,955 bytes)

12. Re: Supertrapp (score: 1)
Author: "William M. Gilroy" <wmgilroy@lucent.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Oct 1999 22:51:27 -0400
I have to wonder if the Supertrapp is the flavor of the week. Trying not to offend people that have them and love them, but I have to wonder how well they work. Not knowing anything about them (how's
/html/spridgets/1999-10/msg00179.html (10,572 bytes)

13. Re: Supertrapp (score: 1)
Author: Frank Clarici <spritenut@Exit109.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Oct 1999 23:07:19 -0400
I can not speak from expierience but a good friend of mine with a Mini has a SuperTrapp, he wants an RC40. It is loud, looks "funny" especially on a Mini driven by a guy pushing 50, but then anybody
/html/spridgets/1999-10/msg00184.html (9,493 bytes)

14. Re: Supertrapp (score: 1)
Author: "Wm. Severin Thompson" <wsthompson@thicko.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 1999 22:24:24 -0500
Ever since my patented megaphone escaped while racing at Mosport this year, I've been running a Supertrapp on the Red Rat Bastard. I'm running it without any discs or end cap. It still muffles to a d
/html/spridgets/1999-10/msg00185.html (10,686 bytes)

15. Re: Supertrapp (score: 1)
Author: "Larry & Sandi Miller" <millerls@ado13.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 1999 20:34:25 -0700
It depends on the baffles that stick out in the air stream... Larry Miller the straight
/html/spridgets/1999-10/msg00186.html (9,868 bytes)

16. Re: Supertrapp (score: 1)
Author: Kroyell@aol.com
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 1999 01:44:26 EDT
<< David , Surprisingly, straight through is not usually the best flow - especially with small engines. Without some restriction/back pressure you lose torque. (I don't know exactly why but someone o
/html/spridgets/1999-10/msg00187.html (9,714 bytes)

17. Re: Supertrapp (score: 1)
Author: Ron Soave <soavero@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 1999 06:02:32 -0700 (PDT)
Something to keep in mind - everytime you change diameters, there is an increase in pressure drop (backpressure). While the increase in duct diameter reduces pressure drop, abrupt diameter changes w
/html/spridgets/1999-10/msg00190.html (8,662 bytes)

18. Re: Supertrapp (score: 1)
Author: Daniel1312@aol.com
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 1999 17:02:14 EDT
<< Without some restriction/back pressure you lose torque. >> This is not correct. Daniel1312
/html/spridgets/1999-10/msg00220.html (7,820 bytes)

19. Re: Supertrapp (score: 1)
Author: Daniel1312@aol.com
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 1999 17:02:15 EDT
<< Supertrapp based on some real experimentation >> By the bank manager, accountant and advertising sales executive maybe? The more discs you remove the more gas it flows but the more noise it makes.
/html/spridgets/1999-10/msg00221.html (8,272 bytes)

20. Re: Supertrapp (score: 1)
Author: Daniel1312@aol.com
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 1999 17:02:17 EDT
<< The RC-40 system is 'tuned' specifically for the a-series engine, and the two cans are placed a specific distance apart so to enhance 'scavenging' of exhaust gasses, and to cancel out noise. >> Ac
/html/spridgets/1999-10/msg00222.html (8,062 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu