Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Sway\s+bar\s+advice\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Sway\s+bar\s+advice\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. Sway bar advice (score: 1): Author: MLishego@aol.com; Date: Mon, 26 May 1997 13:22:11 -0400 (EDT); Hello to all, I need to tap into the wisdom of the members of the list again. I must say that I haven't recieved any bad advice on my MGB yet. Now, I have a question: Does anyone run a chrome-bumpere; /html/mgs/1997-05/msg01533.html (6,814 bytes)
2. Re: Sway bar advice (score: 1): Author: Gary Breeback <vainent@erols.com>; Date: Mon, 26 May 1997 21:55:57 -0400; Mike, From my experience and readings I believe the fellows at Moss are correct and it would be a waste of time and money installing a rear sway bar. Good Luck, Gary; /html/mgs/1997-05/msg01574.html (7,155 bytes)
3. Re: Sway bar advice (score: 1): Author: BDurgin1@aol.com; Date: Mon, 26 May 1997 23:57:44 -0400 (EDT); << Does anyone run a chrome-bumpered MGB with a rear anti-sway bar, and what characteristics does the car have? >> I was told somewhere, perhaps this list, that the rear anti-sway bar on the chrome b; /html/mgs/1997-05/msg01586.html (7,010 bytes)
4. Re: Sway bar advice (score: 1): Author: Glenn Schnittke <schnittke@mindspring.com>; Date: Tue, 27 May 1997 00:11:16 -0500; For one thing there is a lot less weight for the bars to act on in a chrome bumpered car. In a perfect world, the springs are less stiff, too. And the weight DISTRIBUTION is somewhat different as wel; /html/mgs/1997-05/msg01595.html (8,940 bytes)
5. RE: Sway bar advice (score: 1): Author: "doug russell" <dr-doug@msn.com>; Date: Tue, 27 May 97 14:22:50 UT; SNIP.... Also, that the rear bar was strictly for rubber bumper cars. Does any body know why? Was it the fact that the rubber bumper rides higher? Bruce Durgin 64 B; /html/mgs/1997-05/msg01628.html (6,800 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]