- 1. TAC vs Commonsense (score: 1)
- Author: Les Mcclelland <les.mcclelland@wcom.com>
- Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2002 12:30:17 -0600
- Although I know my Tiger is a real Tiger I have not gone to the trouble and associated expense of driving/hauling it several hundred miles at the least to have it TAC'ed. So when I sell it, which wil
- /html/tigers/2002-12/msg00043.html (7,765 bytes)
- 2. Re: TAC vs Commonsense (score: 1)
- Author: TIGEROOTES@aol.com
- Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 19:36:26 EST
- Tiger) (PS I drove "all the way" to Tigers United in Medford, Oregon and had the first one TAC'ed)
- /html/tigers/2002-12/msg00049.html (6,691 bytes)
- 3. Re: TAC vs Commonsense (score: 1)
- Author: "Tom Witt" <wittsend@jps.net>
- Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 20:05:45 -0800
- Actually Les save up those transferable flier miles. As I understand it there has to be THREE inspectors present for a certificate to be issued. Well, maybe you will get lucky and sell it to a TAC i
- /html/tigers/2002-12/msg00051.html (8,813 bytes)
- 4. TAC vs Commonsense (score: 1)
- Author: "Tom Witt" <wittsend@jps.net>
- Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 14:47:19 -0800
- I asked this in the first post I sent this morning, but will ask it again. What is your objection to having your car TAC-ed? What I am asking is if three TAC inspectors were to show up to your door
- /html/tigers/2002-11/msg00228.html (8,197 bytes)
- 5. Re: TAC vs Commonsense (score: 1)
- Author: "DrMayf" <drmayf@teknett.com>
- Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 16:16:27 -0800
- Ok, one last post, then I hit the delete key on this subject (in fact already have hit it several times...) My objection to having my car Tac'd is this. I have owned it for 30 something years (since
- /html/tigers/2002-11/msg00229.html (9,592 bytes)
- 6. Re: TAC vs Commonsense (score: 1)
- Author: Tony McNulty <t.mcnulty@ieee.org>
- Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 20:31:59 -0500
- I understand completely. I bought mine off the showroom floor so I definitely know what it is. However, if and when I ever decide to part with this member of my family (assuming that my two sons wou
- /html/tigers/2002-11/msg00233.html (10,549 bytes)
- 7. Re: TAC vs Commonsense (score: 1)
- Author: Tony McNulty <t.mcnulty@ieee.org>
- Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 21:05:24 -0500
- All nonsense aside -- it simply makes sense from a financial point-of-view to have a valuable asset (only 2000 left?) "proven", much as one would have a valuable antique furniture (or similar) asset
- /html/tigers/2002-11/msg00234.html (10,000 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu