Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TR\s+\/\s+MG\s+Challenge\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TR\s+\/\s+MG\s+Challenge\s*$/: 17 ]

Total 17 documents matching your query.

1. Re: TR / MG Challenge (score: 1): Author: MRogers726@aol.com; Date: Sun, 1 Nov 1998 02:11:30 EST; << This driver was known to me for incidents at events I was working. After we walked away from this guy, Tony looked at me and said that he would give this guy a wide berth on the race track, becaus; /html/vintage-race/1998-11/msg00000.html (7,153 bytes)
2. Re: TR / MG Challenge (score: 1): Author: Jim Hayes <hayes@mediaone.net>; Date: Sun, 01 Nov 1998 11:49:31 -0500; Actually most rulebooks (not just vintage) prohibit contact, and in many cases it ends up taking out both the "contacter" and the "contactee" so neither win. The current practice of contact racing ap; /html/vintage-race/1998-11/msg00003.html (7,344 bytes)
3. Re: TR / MG Challenge (score: 1): Author: JWoesvra@aol.com; Date: Mon, 2 Nov 1998 13:14:14 EST; << Subj: RE: TR / MG Challenge >> Why are you guys going on and on about vintage vs. current cars and using a subject title that denotes our MG/TR Challenge? If you are going to change the subject, p; /html/vintage-race/1998-11/msg00018.html (6,792 bytes)
4. TR / MG Challenge (score: 1): Author: Jack W Drews <vinttr4@geneseo.net>; Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1998 16:03:29 -0500; Re: invitations / acceptance for current SCCA cars: I cast my vote in favor of NOT inviting cars prepared to current SCCA rules. Ditto for drivers who are SCCA drivers, not vintage drivers. Ours is a; /html/vintage-race/1998-10/msg00126.html (8,113 bytes)
5. RE: TR / MG Challenge (score: 1): Author: Jeff Zurschmeide <zurschmeidej@interactivenw.com>; Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1998 14:22:47 -0800; I'm not sure what you mean by "current SCCA rules" and "SCCA drivers." If I hold an SCCA Vintage license, and my car is legal in SCCA Vintage but not in Production, GT, IT, or any other "full competi; /html/vintage-race/1998-10/msg00128.html (9,965 bytes)
6. Re: TR / MG Challenge (score: 1): Author: Jack W Drews <vinttr4@geneseo.net>; Date: Fri, 30 Oct 1998 03:54:28 -0500; You make a good point regarding the need to carefully define my terms when expressing views in these sensitive areas. I do think the current or near-current SCCA safety specs are the very best there; /html/vintage-race/1998-10/msg00130.html (9,552 bytes)
7. Re: TR / MG Challenge (score: 1): Author: Brian Evans <brian@uunet.ca>; Date: Fri, 30 Oct 1998 07:51:48 -0500; We had an example of this at VARAC's Mosport event, when the MG racers came to visit us, and a few modern SCCA guys came up and played. Two cars, I think, from the same team, prepped with slicks, fib; /html/vintage-race/1998-10/msg00131.html (11,504 bytes)
8. Re: TR / MG Challenge (score: 1): Author: "Irv Korey" <emanteno@ibm.net>; Date: Fri, 30 Oct 1998 07:30:17 -0600; came so were a we we modern few I'm going to guess that what Jack may be referring to (and if I'm wrong, please accept my apology Jack) with regards to current era SCCA drivers is that current era S; /html/vintage-race/1998-10/msg00132.html (10,313 bytes)
9. Re: TR / MG Challenge (score: 1): Author: Tombread@aol.com; Date: Fri, 30 Oct 1998 10:07:19 EST; When I began SCCA racing in the late 60s, production car preparation had evolved from the "tape over headlights" stage to a more sophisticated level, but it still fell short of the eventual movement; /html/vintage-race/1998-10/msg00135.html (9,596 bytes)
10. RE: TR / MG Challenge (score: 1): Author: Jeff Zurschmeide <zurschmeidej@interactivenw.com>; Date: Fri, 30 Oct 1998 11:35:30 -0800; It seems to me the big contention is on two points: 1) understanding the nature of vintage racing (about 80% of the problem) 2) wildly variable car preparation (about 20% of the problem) Item 2 is ea; /html/vintage-race/1998-10/msg00140.html (11,209 bytes)
11. Re: TR / MG Challenge (score: 1): Author: mike jackson <grand_wazoo@flinet.com>; Date: Fri, 30 Oct 1998 20:13:20 -0800; I'm with Jack, leave the current race cars at home. I can deal with having a good time and finishing behind a few well prepared and extremely well driven MGBs. And I also thank him for the love he ex; /html/vintage-race/1998-10/msg00145.html (9,353 bytes)
12. Re: TR / MG Challenge (score: 1): Author: Bill Dalton <billd13@essex1.com>; Date: Fri, 30 Oct 1998 18:26:28 -0600; As one who works both SCCA and Vintage races, I think the way I would like to see things go, is not to dilute the vintage races with current spec,flared fendered etc. SCCA production cars, since that; /html/vintage-race/1998-10/msg00146.html (12,028 bytes)
13. Re: TR / MG Challenge (score: 1): Author: Jim Hayes <hayes@mediaone.net>; Date: Fri, 30 Oct 1998 19:25:19 -0500; Jack, many of the vintage groups I have seen follow the "win at all costs" motto too. Except they spend ten times as much as the typical SCCA production racer. One of the joys of racing SCCA is not h; /html/vintage-race/1998-10/msg00147.html (8,451 bytes)
14. Re: TR / MG Challenge (score: 1): Author: Jim Hayes <hayes@mediaone.net>; Date: Fri, 30 Oct 1998 23:10:24 -0500; But that's hard to believe when you go to races, esp. Monterey or the Lime Rock Fall Festival, and see lots more transporters than at a CART or PSR race! Hell, when I say I'm a vintage racer, I'm vin; /html/vintage-race/1998-10/msg00148.html (7,871 bytes)
15. Re: TR / MG Challenge (score: 1): Author: Jim Hayes <hayes@mediaone.net>; Date: Sat, 31 Oct 1998 01:53:21 -0500; I spent this year doing only SCCA and one VARAC event myself. The SCCA remains amateur racing - still very much like it was in the 60s when we started. Same with VARAC - the best racing I've had - Ho; /html/vintage-race/1998-10/msg00149.html (10,789 bytes)
16. RE: TR / MG Challenge (score: 1): Author: SOLOW GREG <gregmogdoc@surfnetusa.com>; Date: Fri, 30 Oct 1998 23:57:19 -0800; I agree that cars prepared to current SCCA "Production Class Rules" = should not be permitted to run "Vintage" events. By definition current = SCCA prepared cars are not Vintage race cars..Vintage ca; /html/vintage-race/1998-10/msg00150.html (10,351 bytes)
17. Re: TR / MG Challenge (score: 1): Author: "Irv Korey" <emanteno@ibm.net>; Date: Sat, 31 Oct 1998 08:28:58 -0600; don't Non taken. And my intention was NOT to paint ALL SCCA club racers with the same brush as well. I was just using 1 individual to make a point. In our area, SCCA does not do vintage. But from wh; /html/vintage-race/1998-10/msg00152.html (8,219 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 17
Page: [1]