Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TR\s+heads\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. RE: TR heads (score: 1)
Author: "Jack Brooks" <brooks@belcotech.com>
Date: Tue, 1 May 2001 07:40:01 -0400
Why does it seem like you don't think the early unchamfered head should be used with anything other than 83mm pistons? While I have not had time/funds to complete my TR4A, 1.5 inch intake head, I ha
/html/fot/2001-05/msg00001.html (8,258 bytes)

2. RE: TR heads (score: 1)
Author: TeriAnn Wakeman <twakeman@cruzers.com>
Date: Tue, 1 May 01 08:44:36 -0700
Sorry if I gave that impression. What I was trying to say is that I believe that the factory never knowingly sold Triumphs with uncamphored combustion chambers and 86mm pistons (Well maybe initially
/html/fot/2001-05/msg00002.html (7,899 bytes)

3. RE: TR heads (score: 1)
Author: Randall Young <ryoung@NAVCOMTECH.COM>
Date: Tue, 1 May 2001 09:13:38 -0700
Jack : I unfortunately didn't save my chamber measurements, but if the compression with 83mm liners was 8.5:1, changing to 87mm liners should bring it up to 9.25:1, if the head and gasket remain the
/html/fot/2001-05/msg00003.html (7,091 bytes)

4. TR heads (score: 1)
Author: "Jack W. Drews" <vinttr4@geneseo.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 12:47:48 +0000
This is longish, and has to do with head variations. If you are interested in TR head modifications, you may want to read it. I'd like some feedback on these observations. Thanks. Terriann Wakeman pu
/html/fot/2001-04/msg00275.html (8,923 bytes)

5. TR Heads (score: 1)
Author: Richard Hardison <cobra@airmail.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 13:31:23 -0500
While on this subject, I wonder what our group thinks about the much modified Computune TR Head? Richard
/html/fot/2001-04/msg00276.html (6,477 bytes)

6. Re: TR heads (score: 1)
Author: TeriAnn Wakeman <twakeman@cruzers.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 01 12:19:55 -0700
(That would be the ball mill made at the head to intake manifold face to assure a good fit between the head and intake manifold given miscellaneous slop factors) I think your #1 head one as a TR3-3A
/html/fot/2001-04/msg00277.html (9,764 bytes)

7. Re: TR heads (score: 1)
Author: "Jack W. Drews" <vinttr4@geneseo.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 14:58:59 +0000
............................... Thanks for your comments. What you say makes sense. I didn't mention it but heads #2 and #3 both have the combustion chamber chamfer. -- uncle jack and New Blue
/html/fot/2001-04/msg00278.html (7,566 bytes)

8. Re: TR Heads (score: 1)
Author: WEmery7451@aol.com
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 21:59:22 EDT
<< Subj: TR Heads Date: 4/30/01 11:33:12 AM Pacific Daylight Time From: cobra@airmail.net (Richard Hardison) Sender: owner-fot@autox.team.net Reply-to: cobra@airmail.net (Richard Hardison) To: fot@au
/html/fot/2001-04/msg00282.html (7,543 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu