- 1. TR3/Peerless info needed (score: 1)
- Author: SpiwakD@aol.com
- Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 08:27:04 EDT
- A friend has a 1959 Peerless GT200 and wants to know if a TR3 rear end will fit. Does anyone have this info? We are looking to use the whole rear axle assembly. Dave
- /html/fot/2005-07/msg00351.html (6,706 bytes)
- 2. RE: TR3/Peerless info needed (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Babcock <BillB@bnj.com>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 06:01:47 -0700
- I don't know what Peerless used, but the size is about right. My only point of reference is the Peerless Ambro that I see every year at Monterey. If it isn't a bolt-in it's probably an easy conversio
- /html/fot/2005-07/msg00352.html (7,634 bytes)
- 3. RE: TR3/Peerless info needed (score: 1)
- Author: "Dodd, Kelvin" <doddk@mossmotors.com>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 09:00:09 -0700
- The Peerless has a De Dion Tube rear end as one of it's primary features. Stuffing a TR3 axle assembly would make it roll around, but methinks the modifications necessary are going to destroy the va
- /html/fot/2005-07/msg00353.html (8,255 bytes)
- 4. RE: TR3/Peerless info needed (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Babcock <BillB@bnj.com>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 09:16:19 -0700
- Bill Dentin replied to Dave but I guess he didn't copy the group. He has a Peerless. I didn't realize they had a De Dion. That makes things a lot more complex. Cool looking cars though. Dave: The Pee
- /html/fot/2005-07/msg00354.html (8,703 bytes)
- 5. Re: TR3/Peerless info needed (score: 1)
- Author: "Dean Tetterton" <Richtr@erols.com>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 13:46:32 -0400
- The Peerless/Warwick has a De Dion rear and it would be a shame to replace it with a solid axle. First off the Peerless is 6 inches wider than a TR3, therefore the axle tube would be too short. Why
- /html/fot/2005-07/msg00355.html (8,307 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu