Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TR3\s+Pistons\/Liners\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. RE: TR3 Pistons/Liners (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2002 10:08:24 -0700
I've used a Mahle piston and liner set in a Porsche 914 motor years ago and was very impressed with the quality. The rings where even pre gaped all you had to do was put them on the con rods and put
/html/triumphs/2002-03/msg00027.html (8,882 bytes)

2. Re: TR3 Pistons/Liners (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2002 11:45:48 -0800 (PST)
Actually, cubic inches WERE substituted long ago by cubic cm or their liter equivalent... Even at the time of production of the TR. 2 advantages: a) you have more of them for the same engine b) you
/html/triumphs/2002-03/msg00039.html (7,058 bytes)

3. Re: TR3 Pistons/Liners (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2002 21:20:30 +0100
For cubic inches , go for the 3.42519685 inches or bigger ! Cheers Mike /// triumphs@autox.team.net mailing list /// To unsubscribe send a plain text message to majordomo@autox.team.net /// with not
/html/triumphs/2002-03/msg00042.html (6,725 bytes)

4. Re: TR3 Pistons/Liners (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2002 14:26:26 -0600
Neither cubic inches nor cubic centimeters are a substitute for cubic money. Absent an engine change, the cubic capacity of a TR engine is limited, but the ability of the car to absorb money is infin
/html/triumphs/2002-03/msg00043.html (7,413 bytes)

5. Re: TR3 Pistons/Liners (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2002 19:15:18 -0500
Message text written by "Jim Hill" money. Absent an engine change, the cubic capacity of a TR engine is limited, but the ability of the car to absorb money is infinite. < Jim, if you go with cubic ce
/html/triumphs/2002-03/msg00059.html (7,161 bytes)

6. TR3 Pistons/Liners (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 07:54:08 EST
What may be the list concensus regarding piston /liner size (83, 86, 87 mm) and supplier. I was considering TRF or MOSS, maybe leaning towards AE Hepolite brand. Currently this "3" has the stock 83 m
/html/triumphs/2002-02/msg01404.html (6,987 bytes)

7. Re: TR3 Pistons/Liners (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 13:19:17 FILETIME=[86A8BEC0:01C1C05A]
Go for the gusto!!! You can get pistons and liners even larger than 87mm from British Frame and Engine... Greg Petrolati Champaign, Illinois 1962 TR4 (CT4852L) That's not a leak... My car's just mar
/html/triumphs/2002-02/msg01407.html (7,544 bytes)

8. Re: TR3 Pistons/Liners (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 09:56:29 -0600
There's no substitute for cubic inches. Go for the 87mm. Irv Korey 74 TR6 CF22767U 63 TR4 VSCDA Group 2 #58 Highland Park, IL /// triumphs@autox.team.net mailing list /// To unsubscribe send a plain
/html/triumphs/2002-02/msg01412.html (7,066 bytes)

9. Re: TR3 Pistons/Liners (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 09:31:37 -0800
I second that opinion...whole heartedly... -- Bill Pugh 1957 TR-3 aka Casper TS16765L /// triumphs@autox.team.net mailing list /// To unsubscribe send a plain text message to majordomo@autox.team.net
/html/triumphs/2002-02/msg01418.html (7,509 bytes)

10. RE: TR3 Pistons/Liners (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 13:56:47 -0500
I would go with the 87MM. I rebuilt my TR4 engine back in Winter 98 with a 87 MM piston/liner set from British Parts Northwest. That winter they were the only ones that had any supply above 83 MM an
/html/triumphs/2002-02/msg01423.html (7,758 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu