Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TR4\s+front\s+spoiler\s+vs\.\s+air\s+dam\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TR4\s+front\s+spoiler\s+vs\.\s+air\s+dam\?\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. TR4 front spoiler vs. air dam? (score: 1): Author: "BOB KRAMER" <rgk@flash.net>; Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 20:55:25 -0500; I am looking for ways to improve top end performance at TWS. We come off the road course onto the front Nascar straight and I run somewhere over 100 mph at the end of the straight. With 3.7 gears an; /html/fot/2001-04/msg00027.html (8,515 bytes)
2. Re: TR4 front spoiler vs. air dam? (score: 1): Author: "baxter culver" <baxterculver@msn.com>; Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 19:06:50 -0700; Garment fouling??? Amici, I am looking for ways to improve top end performance at TWS. We come off the road course onto the front Nascar straight and I run somewhere over 100 mph at the end of the st; /html/fot/2001-04/msg00028.html (9,181 bytes)
3. Re: TR4 front spoiler vs. air dam? (score: 1): Author: GRMTim@aol.com; Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 22:12:04 EDT; Bob Kramer wrote "With 3.7 gears and 195-60-15 Yokes I reach somewhere between 6000-6500 rpm. I can pull with the best of them up to about 90 mph, and around the rest of the track, but when running t; /html/fot/2001-04/msg00029.html (8,132 bytes)
4. Re: TR4 front spoiler vs. air dam? (score: 1): Author: GRMTim@aol.com; Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 22:47:49 EDT; JK knows more about this than I do. You might call him at 850 575 9372. As for aerodynamics... in my head anyway, a TR3 is as slippery and as beautiful as a new Ferrari. Tim Suddard/GRM; /html/fot/2001-04/msg00030.html (7,816 bytes)
5. Re: TR4 front spoiler vs. air dam? (score: 1): Author: N197TR4@cs.com; Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2001 00:06:39 EDT; Come on Kramer!! You are taking this thing way too seriously....you were five seconds faster than me in November at TWS....what more do you want? Ann-Margaret?....btw, did you knw that Ann-Margaret d; /html/fot/2001-04/msg00034.html (9,527 bytes)
6. RE: TR4 front spoiler vs. air dam? (score: 1): Author: "Brad Eells" <bradlnss@lightspeed.net>; Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 23:04:32 -0700; This is interesting actually... I have had my road TR4A traveling in excess of 95mph. I will have to exercise my right to the 5th Amendment if you ask where! ;-) I found the steering becoming very l; /html/fot/2001-04/msg00038.html (9,043 bytes)
7. Re: TR4 front spoiler vs. air dam? (score: 1): Author: BillDentin@aol.com; Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2001 09:38:25 EDT; While my avocation is vintage racing a TR3, my vocation is that of a mason contractor. In my opinion, the TRIUMPH TR3 has all of the areo-dynamics of a brick. Bill Dentinger; /html/fot/2001-04/msg00041.html (8,413 bytes)
8. RE: TR4 front spoiler vs. air dam? (score: 1): Author: Bill Babcock <BillB@bnj.com>; Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2001 18:21:46 -0700; Hmmm. At the end of the back straight at PIR my cheater TR3 read 123 mph via radar gun. I think it's about the same at the end of the much longer straight at SIR since I lift and hold at 6500 RPM. I'; /html/fot/2001-04/msg00064.html (10,500 bytes)
9. Re: TR4 front spoiler vs. air dam? (score: 1): Author: "R. John Lye" <rjl6n@cstone.net>; Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2001 20:24:23 -0400; Hi Bob, It sure seemed to make a difference when we put one on Chip Bond's car. R. John Lye rjl@gt-classics.com http://www.gt-classics.com/; /html/fot/2001-04/msg00065.html (8,361 bytes)
10. RE: TR4 front spoiler vs. air dam? (score: 1): Author: "Roger Beasley" <beeline@iline.com>; Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2001 21:50:27 -0400; Bob and FOT, The negative pressure created by a front spoiler can also greatly improve the airflow through the radiator. A very small spoiler of about 2" depth extending the width of the radiator ope; /html/fot/2001-04/msg00068.html (8,969 bytes)
11. Re: TR4 front spoiler vs. air dam? (score: 1): Author: TRBILBO@aol.com; Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2001 23:51:41 EDT; In aerospace we have an expression...... with enough thrust (horsepower?) even a brick can be supersonic.......surely this explains those quick TR3's?.....smile. Billy B. << Subj: Re: TR4 front spoil; /html/fot/2001-04/msg00072.html (9,003 bytes)
12. Re: TR4 front spoiler vs. air dam? (score: 1): Author: jmwagner <jmwagner@greenheart.com>; Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2001 09:57:53 -0700; In the late 70's, I made my own fiberglass spoiler that presented a very verticle wall from the bumper attachment point down... I can't remember what clearance I gave myself, but I would guess it was; /html/fot/2001-04/msg00080.html (8,563 bytes)
13. Re: TR4 front spoiler vs. air dam? (score: 1): Author: "R. Kastner" <kaskas@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 09:10:16 -0700; The last spoilers I did for the TR-6 and the GT-6 were tested several times with various fiberglass layups so that the thickness allowed the spoiler to bend down as the speed increased. This really c; /html/fot/2001-04/msg00152.html (9,879 bytes)
14. RE: TR4 front spoiler vs. air dam? (score: 1): Author: "Barr, Scott" <sbarr@mccarty-law.com>; Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 10:49:45 -0500; What is the reason for designing the spoiler to allow it to bend up and down rather than just to remain down? Reduction of drag at lower speeds? Scott The last spoilers I did for the TR-6 and the GT; /html/fot/2001-04/msg00154.html (10,364 bytes)
15. Re: TR4 front spoiler vs. air dam? (score: 1): Author: "R. Kastner" <kaskas@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 09:54:47 -0700; Some reduction of drag but at the higher s[peeds you need more covering of the area but the MAIN thing was to pass tech. down times to the out improve depth; /html/fot/2001-04/msg00155.html (10,980 bytes)
16. Re: TR4 front spoiler vs. air dam? (score: 1): Author: Justin <jmwagner@greenheart.com>; Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 09:24:23 -0700; So when you say "bend down".... in essence... it has more to do with making it go lower, than to change the shape, right? Since a tech-pass was your main issue, it was more about having it not appear; /html/fot/2001-04/msg00157.html (12,059 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 16
Page: [1]