Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TR4A\s+vs\s+TR6\s+rag\s+top\s+frame\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TR4A\s+vs\s+TR6\s+rag\s+top\s+frame\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. TR4A vs TR6 rag top frame (score: 1): Author: "Randall" <ryoung@navcomtech.com>; Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 14:35:52 -0700; Is the TR4A soft top frame the same as the TR6 ? If not, is there an easy way to tell the difference ? Please "reply all", as this is Ted's question and he's not on the list. Randall "Real sports ca; /html/triumphs/2005-04/msg00673.html (6,831 bytes)
2. Re: TR4A vs TR6 rag top frame (score: 1): Author: "Gerald M Van Vlack" <jerryvv@alltel.net>; Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 17:55:53 -0400; I believe one of the most noticeable differences would be the front clamping mechanism. The 4A is a hinged clamp that pushes upward while the TR6 is a lever style that is rotated more like the curren; /html/triumphs/2005-04/msg00675.html (7,498 bytes)
3. Re: TR4A vs TR6 rag top frame (score: 1): Author: Ted <triumph66@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 21:51:23 -0400; Hi Jerry and 4A/5/250/Sixers: The problem started 25 years ago when my Dad "harvested" a convertible top frame from a donor car. He promptly welded the 4As header rail to that convertible top frame,; /html/triumphs/2005-04/msg00682.html (8,626 bytes)
4. Re: TR4A vs TR6 rag top frame (score: 1): Author: "Gerald M Van Vlack" <jerryvv@alltel.net>; Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2005 07:14:25 -0400; The first example is not for a TR4A in spite of what the ad says. It has the wrong header rail and front clamp arrangement. The second example is correct for a 4A. Using a TR6 type frame on a 4A wou; /html/triumphs/2005-04/msg00685.html (10,932 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]