Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TR6\/240Z\s+Comparison\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TR6\/240Z\s+Comparison\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: TR6/240Z Comparison (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sun, 08 Dec 1996 09:34:00 -0800; I also had a Z in a former life. The only thing I'd add is the tranny was bullet-proof. There was no way to insult it. Also it just wasnt as much fun cornering as the TR6 is as it tended to oversteer; /html/triumphs/1996-12/msg00347.html (6,967 bytes)
2. Re: TR6/240Z Comparison (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sun, 08 Dec 1996 17:40:06 EST; Hi Steve and all, The latest issue of Car and Driver has a two page spread of the 260Z with a " smaller I remember " bumper saying that they will be offering reconditioned Zs at select dealers. It ha; /html/triumphs/1996-12/msg00363.html (7,030 bytes)
3. RE: TR6/240Z Comparison (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sun, 8 Dec 1996 21:26:33 -0500; Isn't this a great idea! I could not understand why Nissan was advertising with a picture of a yellow older Z car, since they had discontinued the current model, until I read the fine print. They are; /html/triumphs/1996-12/msg00370.html (7,556 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]