Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TR6\s+Wheel\s+Offset\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. TR6 Wheel Offset (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Hill" <jrhill1@facstaff.wisc.edu>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 1998 15:53:50 -0600
Could someone on the list e-mail me the factory stock offset for TR6 15" x 5.5" stock steel wheels? And, if you have the information handy, the weight of a stock steel wheel? My car and all its wheel
/html/fot/1998-02/msg00131.html (6,959 bytes)

2. Re: TR6 Wheel Offset (score: 1)
Author: Mark Bradakis <mjb@cs.utah.edu>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 1998 15:18:01 -0700 (MST)
You should be just fine with 3.75 to 4.0 inches of backspace on big TR wheels. Some alloy wheels with a 4" backspace may tend to rub on the ends of the front upper control arms, but a bit of filing w
/html/fot/1998-02/msg00132.html (6,807 bytes)

3. Re: TR6 Wheel Offset (score: 1)
Author: rgb@exact.com
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 06:58:35 1998
Stock steel wheels are 3.5" from the inside edge to mount point, 3" to outside edge. The lips are .5 inch giving 5.5" wheel width. WhilThe centerline of the tire is 1/4 inch inboard of the mount poin
/html/fot/1998-02/msg00133.html (7,874 bytes)

4. Re: TR6 Wheel Offset (score: 1)
Author: Bob Lang <LANG@ISIS.MIT.EDU>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 1998 11:20:23 -0500 (EST)
[stuff removed] As a devoted Triumph enthusiast, shouldn't you be in England? ;-) Sorry. Sometimes I cannot resist. The real difference is a different alloy, and I'm pretty sure the temper is differe
/html/fot/1998-02/msg00134.html (9,491 bytes)

5. RE: TR6 Wheel Offset (score: 1)
Author: "Bownes, Robert M. (EXCH)" <RMBOWNES@intermedia.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 1998 11:41:33 -0500
Actually, I think the difference is not in the alloy, it is in the thickness of the castings. The Lites are just thinner all over. I have a set for my Spit with slicks on them. I like them ALOT, but
/html/fot/1998-02/msg00135.html (9,056 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu