Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Tach\s+Lubrication\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Tach\s+Lubrication\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. Tach Lubrication (score: 1): Author: "Olson, Mark W" <mark.w.olson@intel.com>; Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2000 09:26:34 -0800; This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. --_=_NextPart_000_01BF5934.5856FA4A charset="ISO-8859-1" Sunbea; /html/tigers/2000-01/msg00105.html (12,659 bytes)
2. RE: Tach Lubrication (score: 1): Author: Theo Smit <TSMIT@isotel.com>; Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2000 11:12:01 -0700; Not that I'm an expert, but wouldn't graphite powder be a reasonable choice? It wouldn't attract dust, anyway, but keep it away from the electronics. Another choice may be one of the teflon-bearing g; /html/tigers/2000-01/msg00106.html (8,171 bytes)
3. Re: Tach Lubrication (score: 1): Author: Steve Laifman <Laifman@Flash.Net>; Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2000 10:20:56 +0000; Well, your message got by the 'word police'. I guess the real question is how you intend to go about 'collecting' the sample? {9-> On a different 'tach', did you know that the BEST lubricant for lim; /html/tigers/2000-01/msg00107.html (13,492 bytes)
4. Re: Tach Lubrication (score: 1): Author: ritchie@mcn.org (Armand & Lorie Ritchie); Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2000 10:24:14 -0800; Mark, this might be way off, but maybe you could try diamond powder. The reason I say this is my youngest son is into lapidary work and he uses this diamond powder compound to do the final polishing; /html/tigers/2000-01/msg00108.html (9,403 bytes)
5. RE: Tach Lubrication (score: 1): Author: "Allan Connell, Jr." <alcon@home.com>; Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2000 13:01:12 -0800; Oh Steve, it's probably a MAC OS "X" problem.....Like Steve Jobs said just the other day: "This will blow you away....." Could not repeat the problem with my PC....and it came through my proxy file s; /html/tigers/2000-01/msg00109.html (14,114 bytes)
6. Re: Tach Lubrication (score: 1): Author: Steve Laifman <Laifman@Flash.Net>; Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2000 14:13:04 +0000; As the March Hare said, after the Mad Hatter complained that his watch no longer worked after the Hare 'fixed' it, "I simply cannot understand that. I used the very finest butter." Surely some sand w; /html/tigers/2000-01/msg00110.html (8,485 bytes)
7. Re: Tach Lubrication (score: 1): Author: Steve Laifman <Laifman@Flash.Net>; Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2000 14:44:04 +0000; Well then Allan, At least you can now see the Martian Pornography that Mark has been hiding in all his e-mails now. Can fool your Micro$oft machine, but our Mac's caught it. Don't worry, though, this; /html/tigers/2000-01/msg00112.html (7,829 bytes)
8. Re: Tach Lubrication (score: 1): Author: FrizBMG@aol.com; Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2000 18:06:17 EST; << Well then Allan, At least you can now see the Martian Pornography that Mark has been hiding in all his e-mails now. Can fool your Micro$oft machine, but our Mac's caught it. Don't worry, though, t; /html/tigers/2000-01/msg00113.html (8,156 bytes)
9. Re: Tach Lubrication (score: 1): Author: "Steve Griffing" <bartdog@mindspring.com>; Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2000 19:15:34 -0500; I don't get it!!!!!; /html/tigers/2000-01/msg00114.html (7,244 bytes)
10. Re: Tach Lubrication (score: 1): Author: Stu Brennan <sbrennan@master.ncounty.net>; Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2000 19:20:25 -0500; Sounds likd an ultra fine abrasive to me. Just the thing to keep all those precision clearances nice and loose.... Stu clip clip He has one that is 50,000 grit, that ought to be fine; /html/tigers/2000-01/msg00115.html (9,457 bytes)
11. Re: Tach Lubrication (score: 1): Author: Carmods@aol.com; Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2000 09:26:19 EST; Hi Mark, I find that synthetic Mobil transmission oil works fine for instruments and clocks. John Logan; /html/tigers/2000-01/msg00125.html (7,333 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]