Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Tach\s+Question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Tach\s+Question\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Tach Question (score: 1): Author: "Jen/Scott" <jsloan798@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 07:56:28 -0800; I have a question concering my tach. I installed an aftermarket tach becuase my original tach seem to bo inaccurate. After I installed it, and looked at the readings, it seems as though the original; /html/tigers/2003-12/msg00042.html (7,006 bytes)
2. RE: Tach Question (score: 1): Author: Theo Smit <theo.smit@dynastream.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 09:30:04 -0700; The dual points should give an overlapping signal to the coil, i.e. the trailing points close before the leading points open, so it will look to the coil like you've just energized it for a longer pe; /html/tigers/2003-12/msg00043.html (7,995 bytes)
3. RE: Tach Question (score: 1): Author: "Bob Palmer" <rpalmer@ucsd.edu>; Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 18:09:57 -0800; There is an adjustment just inside the lamp hole. Turn it until you get it about right at mid-range. As Theo says, the dual point just changes the relative on/off ratio. However, this does have a co; /html/tigers/2003-12/msg00051.html (7,030 bytes)
4. RE: Tach Question (score: 1): Author: "Olson, Mark W" <mark.w.olson@intel.com>; Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 09:24:01 -0800; Sorry to disagree with you, but I have a slightly different opinion regarding the Smiths tach with dual points. First, the calibration pot is not under the lamp hole. The tach guts need to be taken; /html/tigers/2003-12/msg00063.html (8,768 bytes)
5. Re: Tach Question (score: 1): Author: Diane and Roland Dudley <csx2282@juno.com>; Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 15:29:17 -0800; Thanks for posting your site. I've finally managed to relocate my "patina" picture! Another way to take care of the dual point issue is to replace it with a Pertronix unit. Didn't effect my tach, bu; /html/tigers/2003-12/msg00065.html (7,486 bytes)
6. RE: Tach Question (score: 1): Author: "Bob Palmer" <rpalmer@ucsd.edu>; Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 18:11:04 -0800; Thanks for responding with a more detailed explanation of how the electronics work. I had not considered it possible to misadjust dual points so badly as to cause two pulses per firing cycle. This m; /html/tigers/2003-12/msg00067.html (7,260 bytes)
7. Tach question (score: 1): Author: "James E. Pickard" <geowiz@www.worldnet.att.net>; Date: Thu, 02 Sep 1999 22:20:10 -0500; I got my tach back from MoMa today. It looks great. When I sent it off a couple of weeks ago, I believe it was a S4 Alpine tach. It said "4 CLY Positive Earth" and read to 6K with a dual redline area; /html/tigers/1999-09/msg00030.html (7,244 bytes)
8. Tach question (score: 1): Author: Dave Binkley <dbinkley@argotech.com>; Date: Thu, 2 Apr 1998 20:08:38 -0800; My tach works fine at the local repair shop on their bench, but when installed in the car it has no signs of intelligent life. It will occasionally flicker a bit under hard acceleration. This is part; /html/tigers/1998-04/msg00019.html (6,614 bytes)
9. Re: Tach question (score: 1): Author: johnc@nait.ab.ca; Date: Fri, 3 Apr 1998 09:32:44 -0700; Try a separate ground wire from the Tach. Also the Tach in my TIGER would not work when the mounting screws were tightened up. The ground inside of the Tach is very poor in design as the edges of a h; /html/tigers/1998-04/msg00025.html (6,506 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]