Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*The\s+Sacred\s+Octagon\/The\s+Bulletin\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. The Sacred Octagon/The Bulletin (score: 1)
Author: Geoff Love <engconn@infi.net>
Date: Sun, 09 Mar 1997 09:39:41 -0500
Thank you, but no thank you. Would that I had the time. The articles written by Chip Olds were and still are, invaluable. It is sad he is no longer in a position to be able to make contributions of t
/html/mgs/1997-03/msg00347.html (14,265 bytes)

2. Re: The Sacred Octagon/The Bulletin (score: 1)
Author: Leckstein <bleckstein@monmouth.com>
Date: Sun, 09 Mar 1997 08:52:13 -0500
Opinions as David D. expressed, are fine. Its the unwarranted and gratuitous stabs that get me angry. You could have said simply that the "Bulletin" was in your opinion a more informative magazine on
/html/mgs/1997-03/msg00352.html (12,038 bytes)

3. Re: The Sacred Octagon/The Bulletin (score: 1)
Author: TATERRY@aol.com
Date: Sun, 9 Mar 1997 12:38:32 -0500 (EST)
<< Since my comments re the Bulletin, I have received 3 enquiries for the particulars of the club I spoke about and have answered them directly. To save other listers, who may also be interested in t
/html/mgs/1997-03/msg00354.html (8,781 bytes)

4. Re: The Sacred Octagon/The Bulletin (score: 1)
Author: dmeadow@juno.com (David C Littlefield)
Date: Sun, 09 Mar 1997 13:05:44 EST
Oooooh. Intrigue in the world of MG? Since listers only got Geoff's reply (I assume Mike's email was sent to him privately) we can only guess at the ins and outs of the "Mille Miglia" episode. I did
/html/mgs/1997-03/msg00357.html (9,998 bytes)

5. RE: The Sacred Octagon/The Bulletin (score: 1)
Author: "doug russell" <dr-doug@msn.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Mar 97 18:09:35 UT
This seems like a perfectly private affair so I'm keeping out of it - but if I were to say something it might go like this: Leckstein - You are over reacting man!!! Get a hold of yourself (slap - sla
/html/mgs/1997-03/msg00358.html (12,985 bytes)

6. Re: The Sacred Octagon/The Bulletin (score: 1)
Author: Geoff Love <engconn@infi.net>
Date: Sun, 09 Mar 1997 13:39:46 -0500
Mike, once again I will offer a public apology for INADVERTENTLY publicly replying to your private post. I am still a novice at this computer thing, as is witnessed by the mess I make of dealing with
/html/mgs/1997-03/msg00359.html (8,112 bytes)

7. Re: The Sacred Octagon/The Bulletin (score: 1)
Author: Leckstein <bleckstein@monmouth.com>
Date: Sun, 09 Mar 1997 13:53:45 -0500
Your apology is accepted, and lets end this. Please no more comments from those on the list on this subject, enough has been said. I think Geoff agrees. Mike
/html/mgs/1997-03/msg00361.html (8,414 bytes)

8. Re: The Sacred Octagon/The Bulletin (score: 1)
Author: Geoff Love <engconn@infi.net>
Date: Sun, 09 Mar 1997 18:30:19 -0500
I believe that it is a mark of a civilised man who can both offer and accept an apology in the spirit in which it is made, and, hopefully, bear no grudge. I forget who said, "I hate what you say, but
/html/mgs/1997-03/msg00369.html (8,962 bytes)

9. Re: The Sacred Octagon/The Bulletin (score: 1)
Author: Chip Old <fold@mail.bcpl.lib.md.us>
Date: Sun, 9 Mar 1997 22:48:45 -0500 (EST)
And I hope the copy in your workshop is covered with greasey fingerprints, indicating lots of practical use. That's what I wrote all that stuff for. What blows my mind is that I did it all with a ty
/html/mgs/1997-03/msg00377.html (8,982 bytes)

10. Re: The Sacred Octagon/The Bulletin (score: 1)
Author: Ross MacPherson <arm@unix.infoserve.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 1997 00:50:01 -0800
Trust me, Chip. We DO! I'm sure you're "Back to Basics" and "Technically Speaking" articles in TSO will continue to be well thumbed (and well thanked) as long as there's a T left on the road. I know
/html/mgs/1997-03/msg00379.html (8,487 bytes)

11. Re: The Sacred Octagon/The Bulletin (score: 1)
Author: Geoff Love <engconn@infi.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 1997 15:04:45 -0500
Dear Mr. Old. What a delight to realise you are here in Cyberspace, or whatever the current gobbledookspeak is for this medium. I can assure you the one on my bench is covered in greasy finger marks,
/html/mgs/1997-03/msg00405.html (10,123 bytes)

12. The Sacred Octagon/The Bulletin (score: 1)
Author: Mark Sherman <MARKSHERMAN@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 1997 21:25:26 -0800
Bravo to Mike Leckstein on his well-written and enlightening defense of the NEMGT Register and Mr. Knudsen!
/html/mgs/1997-03/msg00424.html (7,638 bytes)

13. The Sacred Octagon/The Bulletin (score: 1)
Author: Mark Sherman <MARKSHERMAN@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 1997 21:46:06 -0800
So you are the guy who wrote all that great material on "Back to the Basics" etc. For me it was not back to the basics.. it was the basics! Thanks for doing such a fine job of technical writing and i
/html/mgs/1997-03/msg00426.html (7,905 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu