Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*The\s+new\s+MG\'s\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*The\s+new\s+MG\'s\s*$/: 19 ]

Total 19 documents matching your query.

1. The new MG's (score: 1): Author: "Stephen J. Hall" <shall@maltanet.omnes.net>; Date: Thu, 02 May 1996 23:47:10 -0700; Hi Guy's What's all this deadness about new MG's doesn't anybody care about the marque in this day and age. If not may I be the first to call all of you a bunch of self centered creeps who live in a; /html/mgs/1996-05/msg00085.html (8,036 bytes)
2. RE: The new MG's (score: 1): Author: "Ernest E. Gilbert" <barrister@lawref.com>; Date: Thu, 02 May 96 15:13:04 -0700; I tend to ask the advise of the learned ladies and gentleman on this list on matters effecting cars I have. In anticipation I bought the slick 1992 limited edition sales brochure, and I went out of m; /html/mgs/1996-05/msg00087.html (8,573 bytes)
3. Re: The new MG's (score: 1): Author: fickes@apple.com (Stan Fickes); Date: Thu, 2 May 1996 15:14:13 -0700; I REALLY resent that statement!! I haven't been ALLOWED to buy a new MG for= over a decade, and now you have the chutzpah to say I'm not loyal to the= marque? What really burns me is the lack of con; /html/mgs/1996-05/msg00090.html (9,070 bytes)
4. Re: The new MG's (score: 1): Author: "U. Goettsch" <ulix@u.washington.edu>; Date: Thu, 2 May 1996 15:43:10 -0700 (PDT); Why don't you write something about them then? Also, a major appeal of our cars is that they are old. They need work, we can improve them every day (by repairing something). Also, if '67 MGB's were s; /html/mgs/1996-05/msg00091.html (9,157 bytes)
5. Re: The new MG's (score: 1): Author: jtilton@vt.edu (Jay Tilton); Date: Thu, 02 May 1996 19:25:30 +0600; Somebody must, but you probably won't find any fans among us Yanks. Except for in photos, most of us have never seen an MG produced after 1980. Even fewer have even had a chance to drive one. That la; /html/mgs/1996-05/msg00095.html (7,601 bytes)
6. Re: The new MG's (score: 1): Author: rdonahue@holli.com (Robert J. Donahue); Date: Thu, 2 May 1996 21:41:27 -0500 (EST); I'm sure others on this list will disagree, but I myself hate new cars. I don't like their styling and I don't like the thousands of dollars of government mandated computers and plumbing under the h; /html/mgs/1996-05/msg00103.html (8,904 bytes)
7. Re: The new MG's (score: 1): Author: Paul Parkanzky <p-parkanzky@onu.edu>; Date: Fri, 3 May 1996 00:47:21 -0400; Steve raises an interesting point. Is the new MG really an MG at all? Of course it will never be the same as the original, but they did build it w/the classics in mind. Would a new MG make a good dai; /html/mgs/1996-05/msg00111.html (8,951 bytes)
8. Re: The new MG's (score: 1): Author: "A.D.Smith" <A.D.Smith@boris.umds.ac.uk>; Date: Fri, 3 May 1996 10:53:17 +0100; Well I have to say that I absolutely completely very muchly agree with you. As a 26 years old Midget driver, I'm sure I don't class as an old fogy, but I'd go with an old car any day. The new MG to; /html/mgs/1996-05/msg00115.html (10,662 bytes)
9. The new MG's (score: 1): Author: dmw@tadpole.co.uk (David Wilkinson); Date: Fri, 3 May 96 11:15:11 BST; I got a brochure for the MGF sent to me here at work - since when did an MG owner need a silly ski rack to go on top at vaste expense. Where have our engineering traditions gone ? And to add insult t; /html/mgs/1996-05/msg00116.html (9,266 bytes)
10. RE:The new MG's (score: 1): Author: etlsjfr@deep-thought.ericsson.se (Steve Foster); Date: Fri, 3 May 96 11:28:33 BST; I test drove the MGF recently. I'd buy one if I didn't have an MGA a prospect for an M type and a wife + 2 kids! I was impressed by the F's roadholding and cornering ability. You see lots around her; /html/mgs/1996-05/msg00117.html (8,420 bytes)
11. Re: The new MG's (score: 1): Author: Cindy_Jizmagian@bcsmac.org (Cindy Jizmagian); Date: 03 May 1996 10:53:13 GMT; Thank you. Thank you very much. : ); /html/mgs/1996-05/msg00124.html (8,007 bytes)
12. Re: The new MG's (score: 1): Author: SimJaysun@aol.com; Date: Fri, 3 May 1996 08:13:27 -0400; Call me ignorant, but I didn't know the new MGs were available. I know they've been talked about for years, but..... I'd actually be very interested in seeing one. If you have a scanner, please atta; /html/mgs/1996-05/msg00129.html (8,090 bytes)
13. Re: The new MG's (score: 1): Author: "Bradley J. Barnes" <barnes.182@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu>; Date: Fri, 3 May 1996 13:15:52 -0400; If we in the states could get our hands on one, belive me we would talk to no end. We love them, it is just harder to talk educated about a car you haven't driven Also a true MG Lover! ** Bradley J.; /html/mgs/1996-05/msg00154.html (8,761 bytes)
14. Re: The new MG's (score: 1): Author: TUSLER%MP050@MPA15AB.mv.Unisys.COM; Date: 03 MAY 96 12:08; <>ones once in a while don't you? It's a new car. It rides well. It looks nice. It doesn't break down. What's to discuss? Anyone looking for advice on a complete restoration of an MGF? "The main pro; /html/mgs/1996-05/msg00163.html (9,082 bytes)
15. Re: The new MG's (score: 1): Author: todd@nutria.nrlssc.navy.mil (Todd Mullins); Date: Fri, 3 May 1996 15:08:31 -0500 (CDT); Hey, is this a majority opinion around here, or a dissenting view? TUSLER-with-the-funky-email-address writes [ about the MGF, presumably ]: As if the MGF were nothing more than a glorified PC. It ha; /html/mgs/1996-05/msg00170.html (10,225 bytes)
16. Re: The new MG's (score: 1): Author: TUSLER%MP050@MPA15AB.mv.Unisys.COM; Date: 03 MAY 96 16:03; The result of shouting through an internet firewall. Appropriate, I guess, for talking about MGs. I have nothing against the new MGs. It just seems to me that the complaint was about the lack of ban; /html/mgs/1996-05/msg00176.html (8,738 bytes)
17. Re: The new MG's (score: 1): Author: Glenn Schnittke <glenns@edge.ercnet.com>; Date: Sat, 4 May 1996 02:28:58 -0500 (CDT); Rest of RANT deleted Point 1. If I could drive one, I'm sure it would make a good daily driver. Point 2. I agree with Bob on the body style. To me it looks like a Miata and a Del Sol spent the night; /html/mgs/1996-05/msg00193.html (9,443 bytes)
18. Re: The new MG's (score: 1): Author: macleodm@cadvision.com (Michael MacLeod); Date: Sat, 4 May 1996 11:27:30 -0600; Hey, am I an old fogy or what? Yup. Welcome to the club. Mike MacLeod, Alberta (where the beer and the antelope freeze) '68 BSA Spitfire '60 MGA '63 Jag Mark 10 '83 BMW R100 RS (Sys.config.poop - Get; /html/mgs/1996-05/msg00201.html (7,671 bytes)
19. Re: The new MG's (score: 1): Author: "Roger Garnett" <rwg1@cornell.edu>; Date: Mon, 6 May 1996 08:33:38 -500; Uh Huh. You haven't looked inside that tachometer, have you? ________ / _ \ Roger Garnett (Roger-Garnett@cornell.edu) / /|| \ \ Agricultural Economics | The Wayward Sports Car Centre \ ||__/ / Ithaca; /html/mgs/1996-05/msg00227.html (7,850 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 19
Page: [1]