Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*The\s+no\-turn\-signal\s+signal\s+\(no\s+LBC\,\s+and\s+lengthy\)\s*$/: 21 ]

Total 21 documents matching your query.

1. The no-turn-signal signal (no LBC, and lengthy) (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 17:56:25 -0600
I came to a realization the other morning. Folks who don't use turn signals obviously can't, and deserve our sympathy and support. I mean, how could anyone with an ounce of sanity not indicate to oth
/html/spridgets/2003-02/msg00417.html (10,542 bytes)

2. Re: The no-turn-signal signal (no LBC, and lengthy) (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 15:23:13 -0800
They're just from southern California. There the turn signal is frowned upon because it does what it is supposed to do, that is, signal others of you intentions. In S.Cal that gives the 'other guy'
/html/spridgets/2003-02/msg00419.html (8,776 bytes)

3. Re: The no-turn-signal signal (no LBC, and lengthy) (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 19:49:24 -0500
I just had one of those days. AND Why the hell can't people turn their headlights on when the conditions are bad???? I have driven almost 600 miles the last two days in very inclement weather and it
/html/spridgets/2003-02/msg00422.html (12,490 bytes)

4. Re: The no-turn-signal signal (no LBC, and lengthy) (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 19:54:03 -0500
Peter I think you made a mistake. It's not the folks behind the wheel, it's the cars themselves. If you notice, the higher the pricetag on the car, the less usefull options. Like signals. Next time c
/html/spridgets/2003-02/msg00423.html (9,785 bytes)

5. Re: The no-turn-signal signal (no LBC, and lengthy) (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 20:47:19 EST
<< They're just from southern California. There the turn signal is frowned upon because it does what it is supposed to do, that is, signal others of you intentions. In S.Cal that gives the 'other guy
/html/spridgets/2003-02/msg00425.html (9,026 bytes)

6. Re: The no-turn-signal signal (no LBC, and lengthy) (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 18:13:37 -0800 (PST)
honda Acura, Datsun Infinity, and toyota Lexsux. And for proof positive, you never see a Mercedes Benz with signals. So either these cars just don't come with signals or the butt licks driving them t
/html/spridgets/2003-02/msg00426.html (9,285 bytes)

7. Re: The no-turn-signal signal (no LBC, and lengthy) (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 22:28:31 -0500
I don't know about the expensive jags, I bought the rock bottom model. Hey it was cheaper than jeep or a pathfinder. The cheap model does have signals and they srill work 1 year later ;) The brake li
/html/spridgets/2003-02/msg00432.html (9,871 bytes)

8. Re: The no-turn-signal signal (no LBC, and lengthy) (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 06:35:58 EST
<< I came to a realization the other morning. Folks who don't use turn signals obviously can't, and deserve our sympathy and support >> And here I thought that all of those cars that didn't have thei
/html/spridgets/2003-02/msg00445.html (9,292 bytes)

9. Re: The no-turn-signal signal (no LBC, and lengthy) (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 07:24:14 -0500 (EST)
We got a bunch up CT way that are the same. It is truly amazing and is responsible for a lot of quarter rear enders which is the maneuver police use in pursuits to cause the pursuee to lose control
/html/spridgets/2003-02/msg00446.html (10,436 bytes)

10. Re: The no-turn-signal signal (no LBC, and lengthy) (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 06:26:36 -0600
I always thought turn signals were an option they decided not to purchase on particular vehicle.... /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net/
/html/spridgets/2003-02/msg00447.html (9,960 bytes)

11. Re: The no-turn-signal signal (no LBC, and lengthy) (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 07:04:38 -0600
67* and sunny in my neck of Texas. The 65 may take a topless trip after work today. Oh the joy of living in our history laden east coast. <g> /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@auto
/html/spridgets/2003-02/msg00449.html (10,152 bytes)

12. Re: The no-turn-signal signal (no LBC, and lengthy) (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 11:01:40 EST
It appear that some feel that "turn signals are for the little people". TuTone /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo ///
/html/spridgets/2003-02/msg00458.html (9,361 bytes)

13. Re: The no-turn-signal signal (no LBC, and lengthy) (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 13:42:43 EST
<< Think I'll take the hardtop today, myself... and for the rest of the week, also, apparently! Winter bites (up here, anyway!:) >> Hey, I even accepted the fact that the top has to go up on the Miat
/html/spridgets/2003-02/msg00464.html (9,366 bytes)

14. Re: The no-turn-signal signal (no LBC, and lengthy) (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 11:20:07 -0800
So that's where our rain is!! Another bright sunny day up here in the North banana belt. Yesterday it was 60 degrees. Just about ready to go shirtless! Later, Paul A /// unsubscribe/change address re
/html/spridgets/2003-02/msg00472.html (9,567 bytes)

15. Re: The no-turn-signal signal (no LBC, and lengthy) (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 20:45:50 -0500
Speaking of weather and tops, is 80 and sunny warm enough to install a new top (just to take it down to enjoy the sun). Promising to go into the 80's here in sunny ol Florida this weekend Warm and su
/html/spridgets/2003-02/msg00486.html (9,879 bytes)

16. Re: The no-turn-signal signal (no LBC, and lengthy) (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 21:33:48 -0500
Good I'll be there on Saturday with my golf clubs in hand. Dave 60 Bugeye 61 Bugeye (Project) 69 MGB (For Sale) 74 MGB (Parting Out) 80's for /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@auto
/html/spridgets/2003-02/msg00493.html (9,990 bytes)

17. Re: The no-turn-signal signal (no LBC, and lengthy) (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 22:24:08 -0500
and i have to endure this frosty stuff untill march when i head to new /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo /// Archives
/html/spridgets/2003-02/msg00500.html (9,965 bytes)

18. Re: The no-turn-signal signal (no LBC, and lengthy) (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 00:21:36 -0500
I've got a car that had turn signals as an option...........oh, wait, it's a Ford from 1949, they became standard equipment just after that. Dave /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@
/html/spridgets/2003-02/msg00504.html (9,682 bytes)

19. Re: The no-turn-signal signal (no LBC, and lengthy) (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 12:02:48 EST
One of the first cars that I drove in 1964 was a 1950 Pontiac that had a turn signal conversion in it. What a tank that was. JP John Poynton Havertown, PA 79 midget "Yellow Fever" /// unsubscribe/cha
/html/spridgets/2003-02/msg00516.html (8,274 bytes)

20. Re: The no-turn-signal signal (no LBC, and lengthy) (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 00:39:31 EST
<< I am trying to remember when they actually did...I don't think my Dad's '49 Chevy had them, though the '52 Merc. that took it's place, did. >> My 49 Dodge definitely did. The bugeye that replaced
/html/spridgets/2003-02/msg00557.html (8,469 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu