Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*The\s+ultimate\s+virus\s+fix\s+$no\s+LBC$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*The\s+ultimate\s+virus\s+fix\s+$no\s+LBC$\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: The ultimate virus fix (no LBC) (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2001 08:03:04 -0700; If you keep saying that, I'm going to have one of my hacker friends whip up a Mac virus, just for you ! Macs are no more virus-proof than any other computer, it's just that there's so few people run; /html/triumphs/2001-07/msg01282.html (7,369 bytes)
2. Re: The ultimate virus fix (no LBC) (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2001 09:42:30 -0700; Actually they are relatively virus proof, the OS is still proprietary software, not widly distributed like WinDoze by MicroShaft. It takes a Real hacker to crack a Mac, not your local teenage pothead; /html/triumphs/2001-07/msg01285.html (8,064 bytes)
3. Re: The ultimate virus fix (no LBC) (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2001 22:41:00 -0400; Message text written by Randall there's so few people running them, the hackers aren't interested. Who wants to write a virus that infects 100 computers, when you could be writing one that will infec; /html/triumphs/2001-07/msg01301.html (6,946 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]