Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Thinking\s+in\s+a\s+Vacuum\s+\-\-\s+the\s+thread\s+lives\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Thinking\s+in\s+a\s+Vacuum\s+\-\-\s+the\s+thread\s+lives\!\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Thinking in a Vacuum -- the thread lives! (score: 1): Author: Robert Allen <boballen@sky.net>; Date: Wed, 09 Apr 1997 10:36:28 +0000; Well, shoot, for awhile there we were dancing so well together! I still contend that manifold vacuum tries to make maximum available vacuum available to accesories. The example was power brake booste; /html/mgs/1997-04/msg00354.html (9,397 bytes)
2. Re: Thinking in a Vacuum -- the thread lives! (score: 1): Author: todd@nutria.nrlssc.navy.mil (Todd Mullins); Date: Wed, 9 Apr 1997 10:54:20 -0500 (CDT); Damn. I forgot about that. I still don't see why this is necessarily true. Perhaps instantaneous vacuum levels are higher nearer the valves, but integrating over the time periods during which vacuum-; /html/mgs/1997-04/msg00357.html (8,226 bytes)
3. Re: Thinking in a Vacuum -- the thread lives! (score: 1): Author: Robert Allen <boballen@sky.net>; Date: Wed, 09 Apr 1997 12:12:52 +0000; I think we are pretty much in agreement and may have talked this through to the point of splitting hairs. If we believe that manifold vacuum is merely taken off a convenient point from the manifold,; /html/mgs/1997-04/msg00365.html (9,980 bytes)
4. Re: Thinking in a Vacuum -- the thread lives! (score: 1): Author: "REICHLE, CHRISTOPHER" <CREICHLE@nsc.msmail.miami.edu>; Date: Wed, 09 Apr 1997 14:46:00 -0700 (PDT); Actually, a manifold vacuum tap location right near the valves would be a poor source of vacuum because it would be contaminated with shock waves of presure bouncing off the valves as they close. Abr; /html/mgs/1997-04/msg00375.html (8,427 bytes)
5. Re: Thinking in a Vacuum -- the thread lives! (score: 1): Author: EMILY COWEN <ecowen@cln.etc.bc.ca>; Date: Wed, 9 Apr 1997 12:41:47 -0700 (PDT); Hi Robert Allen!! Ah come on youse guyz!! You couldn't be sleeping through ALL your high school math/physics classes, could you?? Yes, theoretically you WILL find a higher degree of vacuum the closer; /html/mgs/1997-04/msg00380.html (8,041 bytes)
6. Re: Thinking in a Vacuum -- the thread lives! (score: 1): Author: Nolan Penney <npenney@erols.com>; Date: Wed, 09 Apr 1997 22:35:48 -0400; Take a manifold vacuum line off at idle, and notice how high the suction in it is. Put a vacuum gauge on it if you've got one. Take the port vacuum line off at idle, and notice how low the suction in; /html/mgs/1997-04/msg00400.html (8,195 bytes)
7. Re: Thinking in a Vacuum -- the thread lives! (score: 1): Author: EMILY COWEN <ecowen@cln.etc.bc.ca>; Date: Thu, 10 Apr 1997 01:44:26 -0700 (PDT); Hi Nolan Penney!! In the "old days" we used to call this venturie vacuum, NOT port vacuum Different name, same action... TTUL8r, Kirk Cowen; /html/mgs/1997-04/msg00410.html (7,396 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]