Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Third\s+time\'s\s+a\s+charm\?\s+NO\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Third\s+time\'s\s+a\s+charm\?\s+NO\!\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Third time's a charm? NO! (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: 4 Aug 1998 17:01:32 PST; I'm starting to get really frustrated. I just failed my emissions test for the third time. Every time has shown improvement, and now I'm only failing in CO output. The limit is 3.00 and I'm reading 4; /html/triumphs/1998-08/msg00260.html (6,797 bytes)
2. Re: Third time's a charm? NO! (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 05 Aug 1998 06:44:58 +0200; if it's only the CO that's high, then I suggest You use about a gallon of fuel [for the test only!] comprising ~65-75% high octane petrol and ~25-35% pure 96% alcohol. I do it every year with my tru; /html/triumphs/1998-08/msg00291.html (8,716 bytes)
3. Re: Third time's a charm? NO! (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 5 Aug 1998 09:47:54 -0400 (EDT); if you think you've got it bad. I had a VA state inspector fail my '76 Spitfire because it had no catalytic converter, or air-pump. I told him that the cylinder heads had no ports for an air-manifol; /html/triumphs/1998-08/msg00301.html (8,015 bytes)
4. Re: Third time's a charm? NO! (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 5 Aug 1998 11:10:07 -0400; That 18 wheeler produces a lot of smoke, but zero carbon monoxide. That is the nature of diesel gas. I guess it looks worse than it is, but i doubt a Spitfire would be more hazardous than that!; /html/triumphs/1998-08/msg00311.html (7,499 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]