Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Tiger\s+Rear\s+End\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Tiger\s+Rear\s+End\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. Tiger Rear End (score: 1): Author: Gene <tigeriowa@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 12:36:24 -0700 (PDT); It has been some time since I posted anything here. Had my Tiger at Chicago RediStrip in queue far too long. Getting ready to load it up on the rotisserie and treat it to some new(er) metal. I under; /html/tigers/2001-07/msg00336.html (7,794 bytes)
2. Re: Tiger Rear End (score: 1): Author: Steve Laifman <SLaifman@SoCal.RR.com>; Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 13:34:33 -0700; The DANA 44 rear end was the standard one that fit in many US vehicle, like a Jeep, just make sure you get the right splines. There is an alternative, and that is the DANA 44 made in England, by Sal; /html/tigers/2001-07/msg00337.html (9,513 bytes)
3. Re: Tiger Rear End (score: 1): Author: BlueGolfer@aol.com; Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 16:47:51 EDT; snip the rest. I concur with Steve's recommendation. I went with a wide ratio gears and highly recommend it. You do have to shift out of first a little quickly but that is fun. Rob; /html/tigers/2001-07/msg00338.html (7,344 bytes)
4. FW: Tiger Rear End (score: 1): Author: "Adin,David" <DavidAdin@mercydurango.org>; Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 15:38:10 -0600; Great info for those of us (or just me) that don't know our filler aperature from an a$$ in the ground. "I was told" (again because IDKS [1]) my car is the "Dana 44" w/ 3.50 gears (is this a 3.54 may; /html/tigers/2001-07/msg00339.html (10,896 bytes)
5. RE: Tiger Rear End (score: 1): Author: "Tom Witt" <wittsend@jps.net>; Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 22:24:26 -0700; Steve, Unless I was looking in the wrong place at a Toploader site I saw prices of $125-$150 for each of the gears and I think it was $175 for the counter gears. Even on the low side this comes to ov; /html/tigers/2001-07/msg00342.html (7,658 bytes)
6. Re: Tiger Rear End (score: 1): Author: BlueGolfer@aol.com; Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2001 08:51:56 EDT; Total rebuild cost me about $650 by Mike Durham, however, I heard he stopped doing rebuilds as he was promotted to CEO of a bank! Rob; /html/tigers/2001-07/msg00343.html (7,505 bytes)
7. Re: Tiger Rear End (score: 1): Author: JHef101@aol.com; Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2001 09:34:06 EDT; Do you know which Jag the limited slip came in? Was it a Mk. II ? If one was to scrounge through old Brit salvage yards what would we look for? Jeff Hefner B9470028; /html/tigers/2001-07/msg00344.html (7,104 bytes)
8. Re: Tiger Rear End (score: 1): Author: Steve Laifman <SLaifman@SoCal.RR.com>; Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2001 08:10:57 -0700; Sorry, Jeff Mine was at a transmission specialists. Ask an independent Jag mechanic. He may even have one. I think a Mk II would be a good start. A junk (er- recycled parts store) for foreign cars ha; /html/tigers/2001-07/msg00345.html (8,257 bytes)
9. Re: Tiger Rear End (score: 1): Author: Steve Laifman <SLaifman@SoCal.RR.com>; Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2001 09:27:17 -0700; Another thought on DANA LSD. The main difference, and advantage, of the Jaguar unit is the size of the carrier holes that the ring gear bolts pass through to clamp the ring gear to the differential.; /html/tigers/2001-07/msg00347.html (8,217 bytes)
10. Re: Tiger Rear End (score: 1): Author: JHef101@aol.com; Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2001 14:26:54 EDT; Isn't the big difference also the number of splines? As I recall from some investigation the jeep and scout Dana 44's are a different spline count while the Jag splines are the same. It has been awh; /html/tigers/2001-07/msg00349.html (7,531 bytes)
11. tiger rear end (score: 1): Author: ritchie@mcn.org (Armand & Lorie Ritchie); Date: Wed, 3 Feb 1999 09:40:31 -0800 (PST); Who was looking for a rear end for their tiger?? There's one on ebay: http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=63154576 here's the discription: Complete Sunbeam Tiger Rear End. Has a 4:; /html/tigers/1999-02/msg00043.html (6,987 bytes)
12. Re: tiger rear end (score: 1): Author: Alvin and Lucille Johnson <johnson@ids.net>; Date: Wed, 03 Feb 1999 19:17:07 -0500; It'll make it quick up to about 60mph. Then, w/13" rims, It'll be topped Al J.; /html/tigers/1999-02/msg00053.html (6,653 bytes)
13. Re: tiger rear end (score: 1): Author: Bob Palmer <rpalmer@ames.ucsd.edu>; Date: Wed, 03 Feb 1999 21:49:31 -0800; Al, Armand, et Listers, While I'm sure that Al meant his comment as hyperbole, the numbers say that the engine rpms at 60 mph with 4.27:1 ratio would be a little under 3600 rpm (ca. 3560). Not where; /html/tigers/1999-02/msg00056.html (7,347 bytes)
14. Re: tiger rear end (score: 1): Author: "Rich Atherton" <gumby@connectexpress.com>; Date: Wed, 3 Feb 1999 18:51:00 -0800; This would be a Launch Rocket, that would also eat up tires..Not to mention the owners reluctance to lift his foot off to reduce the Blue Smoke Haze that would be Billowing out of the rear fender wel; /html/tigers/1999-02/msg00064.html (7,994 bytes)
15. Re: tiger rear end (score: 1): Author: ritchie@mcn.org (Armand & Lorie Ritchie); Date: Thu, 4 Feb 1999 09:06:53 -0800 (PST); Hay I new some guys from the city (SF) that used to run 4.56 gears so that they could wind up between the stop lights. They were great street racers. But not to good for freeway travel. I'll stick wi; /html/tigers/1999-02/msg00073.html (6,814 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]