Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Tiger\s+Soft\s+Top\s+Cover\s+Question\s+\(soft\s+boot\s+or\s+metal\?\)\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Tiger Soft Top Cover Question (soft boot or metal?) (score: 1)
Author: Jonathan Evans <jonathan.evans@microcraftcorp.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 10:50:16 -0500
Just noticed on the email about the Tiger for sale on eBay that it has the metal (?) body color flaps that hide the soft top when it is down. Was this a feature of the earlier MK1's??? My father's mk
/html/tigers/2000-03/msg00378.html (8,103 bytes)

2. RE: Tiger Soft Top Cover Question (soft boot or metal?) (score: 1)
Author: Theo Smit <TSMIT@isotel.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 09:13:39 -0700
The Tigers were switched over between the Mk1 and Mk1A, which occurred more or less in the 1965 model year. The mk1A was not a factory-recognized separate 'series' but has been adopted by the Tiger c
/html/tigers/2000-03/msg00381.html (10,003 bytes)

3. RE: Tiger Soft Top Cover Question (soft boot or metal?) (score: 1)
Author: Theo Smit <TSMIT@isotel.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 10:12:07 -0700
It's been pointed out that I fudged one of the numbers in my little serial number rant. The mk1 Tigers were B947xxxx. Theo <snip>
/html/tigers/2000-03/msg00386.html (7,756 bytes)

4. Re: Tiger Soft Top Cover Question (soft boot or metal?) (score: 1)
Author: Larry Paulick <larry.p@erols.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 18:47:20 -0500
Theo, now I have another use for my old socks. Good idea. Thanks Larry
/html/tigers/2000-03/msg00392.html (6,864 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu