- 1. Re: Tiger manual responses (score: 1)
- Author: "Andy Walker" <awtiger@ix.netcom.com>
- Date: Sat, 14 Mar 1998 00:56:09 -0600
- Why don't we just settle down a little here over this Tiger manual business? Being an outsider looking in, it is obvious there is some serious bad blood here between two distinct Tiger factions on t
- /html/tigers/1998-03/msg00091.html (8,435 bytes)
- 2. Re: Tiger manual responses (score: 1)
- Author: "Doug & Rett Leithauser" <dleit@mintcity.com>
- Date: Sat, 14 Mar 1998 07:39:07 -0500
- It's nice to hear one calm voice in all this stupid argument. Many of these postings remind me of my kids fighting. When they were about 12. Doug Leithauser -- that is these over?"
- /html/tigers/1998-03/msg00092.html (9,266 bytes)
- 3. Re: Tiger manual responses (score: 1)
- Author: Tom Hall <modtiger@engravers.com>
- Date: Sat, 14 Mar 1998 21:20:11 -0800
- Dear Andy, It is appropriate for you and others to know that no "mud" has been slung on this list by any current active member of the STOA TAC. We have no control over what other list members say in
- /html/tigers/1998-03/msg00097.html (7,588 bytes)
- 4. Re: Tiger manual responses (score: 1)
- Author: tiger technologies <tartanad@ix19.ix.netcom.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Mar 1998 09:50:21 +0000
- Thank you for your sense of reason. We agree with you that it just wasn't worth the bitter back and forth diatribe to continue with this project. Gee, I would have thought STOA would have been elate
- /html/tigers/1998-03/msg00115.html (9,214 bytes)
- 5. Re: Tiger manual responses (score: 1)
- Author: Ray Bridenbaugh <briden@norcross.mcs.slb.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Mar 1998 14:43:22 -0500
- To all involved, As a member of this post, just watching this argument from the outside, all of you involved need to quit trying to get in the last word! "Thanking" someone for their "reason" and in
- /html/tigers/1998-03/msg00118.html (10,008 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu