Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Tigers\s+VS\s+Corvette\'s\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Tigers\s+VS\s+Corvette\'s\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Tigers VS Corvette's (score: 1): Author: Bennett Cullen-P21988 <Cullen.Bennett@motorola.com>; Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 15:44:25 -0700; I presently own a B9472658 (65 MK-1), essentially stock (0.030 over 289 with stock close ratio tranny and 2.88 rear). I have previously owned a 1959 corvette convertible (283 with 2ea 550 4barrels (; /html/tigers/1999-08/msg00041.html (8,703 bytes)
2. Re: Tigers VS Corvette's (score: 1): Author: Steve Wickland <wickland@poseidontech.com>; Date: Tue, 03 Aug 1999 16:18:24 -0700; Wow, is this typical? The original road tests were 8.5 sec. to 60 and about 16 sec. in the 1/4 if my memory serves. If I got that out of my Tiger what Cullen does, I would have never gone for the 5.0; /html/tigers/1999-08/msg00043.html (7,945 bytes)
3. Re: Tigers VS Corvette's (score: 1): Author: Brushy Creek Vineyards/Les Constable <brushyck@wf.net>; Date: Tue, 03 Aug 1999 19:08:09 -0500; If you can't get rubber (break loose) in all four gears and get an honest 125 mph out of your stock tiger then it is not running right. Hell you can almost do 0 - 60 mph in first gear and when coming; /html/tigers/1999-08/msg00045.html (7,673 bytes)
4. Re: Tigers VS Corvette's (score: 1): Author: MWood24020@aol.com; Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 22:30:13 EDT; << The original road tests were 8.5 sec. to 60 and about 16 sec. in the 1/4 if my memory serves. >> Keep in mind that the original road tests were run on skinny, bias ply tires and with no traction b; /html/tigers/1999-08/msg00047.html (8,187 bytes)
5. Re: Tigers VS Corvette's (score: 1): Author: Chris.S.Mottram@ecc.com; Date: Wed, 4 Aug 1999 10:31:24 -0400; Chris S. Mottram@ECCI 08/04/99 10:31 AM My warm 260 (mild cam, Carter AFB 650) without being tuned properly (I need WAY leaner jets) runs about even in the acceleration department with my friend's ho; /html/tigers/1999-08/msg00051.html (7,375 bytes)
6. Re: Tigers VS Corvette's (score: 1): Author: James Barrett <jamesbrt@mindspring.com>; Date: Wed, 04 Aug 1999 17:18:25 -0400; Les, If you are getting "rubber" in 3rd to high shift with a stock tiger, then I would recommend new softer & wider tires plus traction bars. Spinning the tires is not the quickest way to the next in; /html/tigers/1999-08/msg00062.html (8,139 bytes)
7. Re: Tigers VS Corvette's (score: 1): Author: James Barrett <jamesbrt@mindspring.com>; Date: Wed, 04 Aug 1999 17:33:43 -0400; What is a corvette, is that the thing with a flat sick six in the rear or is it some kind of old sailing ship? I did see a pink plastic thing once called a Barby corvette(about a foot long), but it d; /html/tigers/1999-08/msg00063.html (7,889 bytes)
8. Re: Tigers VS Corvette's (score: 1): Author: Steve Laifman <laifman@flash.net>; Date: Thu, 05 Aug 1999 13:11:55 -0700; Steve, It is obvious that you are unaware of the serious under-hood modifications Cullen has made to his beloved Tiger. You, too, could have that kind of performance if you follow his lead. First, pu; /html/tigers/1999-08/msg00091.html (9,491 bytes)
9. RE: Tigers VS Corvette's (score: 1): Author: Bennett Cullen-P21988 <Cullen.Bennett@motorola.com>; Date: Thu, 5 Aug 1999 13:41:29 -0700; Steve, Would you please direct some of that BS toward my flower beds, the plants will love it. be inflate to Just a few dabs of strategically placed grease blobs work wonders too! Here's a bit of tri; /html/tigers/1999-08/msg00095.html (10,755 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]